Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

Since last December the bulls have been calling for a drop in the Fed interest rate. Some anticipated an interim pay-off near the close on Thursday when the last print on the 10-year yield failed to maintain its announcement high, fulfilling the dictum of selling on the news. The number of Friday’s declines on both the NYSE and NASDAQ were above the number of rising prices.

 

With the much-expected rate cut I found it interesting that the sample surveys of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) were bearish for the last three weeks. The six-month projections stayed in the 40% range for all three weeks (42.4%, 49.5%, and 43.4% respectively). In the latest week, which probably did not benefit from Thursday’s rate cut, the bullish estimate of 41.7% was slightly below the bearish call.

 

The explanation for the three main market indices rising to record levels from their April lows this week was the familiar “FOMO”, fear of missing out. I suspect traders sharing that impulse were largely housed in retail-oriented wealth management arms of brokerage firms and non-trust departments of banks.

 

The battle for investment survival is being waged by armies marching under the “FOMO” banner, as well as others withholding their purchase orders upon reading the economic data. There are two ammunition arsenals safeguarding the non-buyers, the declining number of job-openings and the rise of non-US traded equities benefiting from the fall of the US dollar. In April there were 158,000 jobs added, which fell to 22,000 in August. Barron’s shows the investment performance of 14 local markets in Europe and Asia each week. This week Europe had 4 risers and Asia 8. Asian and Emerging Market funds were most prominent among the better performing mutual funds this week.

 

On a longer-term basis there are a number of worries about investing in US markets:

1. The US market is becoming more speculative, with year-over-year NYSE share volume rising 16.24% and NASDAQ 68.97%.
2.  The current administration appears to want to reduce the independence of the Federal Reserve.
3. The President and SEC are floating the idea of switching from quarterly reporting to semiannual. Both ideas will make foreign-traded issues more attractive than they are now.
4. The drive to include non-publicly traded securities in retail accounts, particularly retirement portfolios, is expected to increase the risk of losses.
5. The London edition of the Financial Times devoted a full page to the headline “A new era of McCarthyism?”, showing a picture of President Trump and the late Senator McCarthy. This reminds me of sibling rivalry between an older brother and a successful younger brother. With a number of listed London exchange stocks moving to the US there is risk to a portion of the London market.

  

With the US stock market indices but not the average shares at record levels and the economy open to question, please be careful.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper's Blog: Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Long-Term Investors, Mistakes Ahead - Weekly Blog # 624

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Long-Term Investors, Mistakes Ahead

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

We wish and hope that all of our readers and
their loved ones are in good health and none
suffer from Covid-19 and its aftermaths.

Investing is, or should be, a series of learning experiences. In the long-term, we apparently learn more from our mistakes than from our “successes”. One puzzling occurrence that I have noted are some individual and institutional investors making repeated mistakes that impact their long-term investment results. At critical points in time, instead of utilizing their usual contemplative decision making, they allow emotions to drive decisions. I believe we are approaching a juncture where a sizeable number of otherwise smart investors make investment decisions that significantly hurt their future long-term returns, if not reversed.

The Focal Point of Large, Sudden Recoveries
We hit a “stealth” bottom on March 18th, with a “test” on March 23rd, in the US and many other markets. (A test occurs below or higher than the first bottom, but critically does not lead to more selling and substantially lower prices.) Since these low points, some mutual funds have jumped by 40% or more. In just the last trading week, the 25-best performing mutual funds gained between +35% and 21.36%. Traditional investors could choose to ignore these results due to the performance leaders likely making successful extreme bets. Relative to the impact on the wealth of the total investor population, the performance of the 25 largest long-term funds is relevant. It’s also worth noting from a national economic standpoint that the performance of the middle of the road “Core” equity funds is especially important, as this is where the largest portion of individual and institutional money is invested. I believe it is significant that the best performing large mutual fund for the week was American Fund’s Washington Mutual Investors. It rose +10.03%, while the worst all large-cap equity funds, a global equity income fund, gained +4.98%. To put this perspective, annualizing the gain of +4.98% would surpass 250%, an impossibility. This demonstrates how unusual the week was.

Ok it is Unsustainable, Now What? = Mistakes
There are three mistakes people make when investment performance appears too good.

• An immediate attempt to lock-in an unsustainable gain, a smart decision if one is never to invest again. The first problem in selling at the presumed top is that it puts a high premium on making two correct investment decisions consecutively. The skill to recognize tops and bottoms are quite different. Recognizing the present situation while fathoming the future, or more correctly futures, is quite different. Remember, many investors believe the sole reason for the market decline in the February-March period was the Coronavirus, not our concern of a tactical and strategic slowdown in earnings power generation. (The odds on identifying future trends different from those extrapolated from the present is probably 50% to 65%, allowing for the occasional surprise.) 
• The nature of critical turning points is the second problem. Almost by definition a turning point is when the bulk of trading actively changes radically, an emotional change. To be in a position to timely anticipate the change you must believe you can accurately feel what the crowd is thinking and when it is changing. From a profit and loss standpoint, there is no difference between being premature and wrong.
• The third hurdle is the assumption that the investor completely knows of any changes in demand placed on the advisor of the capital in the investment account. As an investment advisor I have never been comfortable with such assertions by others, or myself. We live in an uncertain world.

Another group of investors that has a substantial proportion of their wealth uninvested is driven by “FOMO” (Fear Of Missing Out). They want to quickly make up for lost time and get invested in stocks that are moving up. Their answer is to jump on whatever is moving most. This is called momentum. The problem with this choice is that after the original investors’ needs are met, as the only thing driving these stocks higher are other momentum players who may quickly move on to other investments.

To avoid these problems, if you find yourself with excess capital after filling all your essential reserve requirements, I suggest you divide the excess capital into perhaps ten segments, then invest a segment on each down day, which often fall on Fridays. For those more long-term oriented who have obligations to others, I suggest with bias that they consider a portfolio of mutual funds, allowing professionals to make tactical decisions.

A Contrarian’s Dilemma
Almost all investment courses take the easy way out by statistically analyzing financial statements and past economic conditions. The reality is the value of a stock is comprised of two very different aspects. While the first is taught, the second relies on the attitudes of those with buying power. This in turn is impacted by the buyers urgency to buy and the present owner’s urgency to sell. Price is where the two forces meet, with the next price a function of the size of the commitment of both sides at current prices. If the competing buyers have more money, the sellers will benefit from a higher price. If the seller demonstrates a larger desire to offload his/her merchandise, the intelligent buyer will get a temporary bargain. This equilibrium price is not only recorded in the regulatory records, but is also remembered by the participants and those who analyze their actions, e.g. market or technical analysts who don’t have the benefit of the specific motivations behind the trade. When there are a significant number of price changes in one direction, a trend is identified. No trend goes on forever and eventually reverses. A successful contrarian attempts to capitalize on trends that reverse direction. Historically, the trend best expected to reverse is the one trumpeted by many “experts”, or other pundits. Most of them currently anticipate further single digit gains following those generated since mid to late March. With the preponderance of investors sharing that view, I as a contrarian (long-shot better) am wondering whether we are setting up for a period of double-digit future gains?

This is where market analysis might foretell the future, without knowing the motivation of future buyers and sellers. Because of my background in analyzing mutual funds and similar vehicles, I often turn to their performance data for clues. For the last five years through Thursday’s close the three largest categories by current assets have produced very sub-par compounded returns: US Diversified Equity +3.83%, Domestic Long-Term Fixed Income +2.09 %, and World Equity +0.24%. None of these averages meet actuarial requirements or satisfy planned endowment expenditures. This suggests that many pension and probably other retirement funds, including endowments, are underfunded, potentially requiring larger future contributions and lower reported earnings, or in the case of endowments less ambitious plans. They could also be bailed out by a significant period of gains over 20%. (It used to be that gains over 20% were excluded in actuarial calculations.)

As someone who must meet payroll and other business and family expenses, I cannot completely live in the world of market analysis or contrarianism. Thus dear reader, please send me a message of what will motivate buyers of securities enough to raise returns to high single digit levels, with an occasional low double-digit gain year and only minor declines. I need help!!

Long Shot
As is often the case, the solution could come from beyond the present universe where we have the vast bulk of our assets. Perhaps there will be a reversal in the value of the safe-haven dollar, without medical and demographic plagues interfering with them. Emerging markets, with particular emphasis on Asia and later Africa, are currently an unpopular area. Both could make sense for our younger grandchildren, or more likely great grandchildren, but it won’t meet retirement needs or the needs for better educational diversity and other worthwhile goals.

Question: How are you addressing your investments today in order to meet longer-term needs? 



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/04/time-to-get-out-of-foxhole-weekly-blog.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/03/where-we-are-depends-on-where-we-have.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/03/stealth-bottom-and-other-considerations.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Where is the Stock Market Going? ESG Might Learn from Columbus - Weekly Blog # 598

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Where is the Stock Market Going? ESG Might Learn from Columbus

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

CORRECT CONTRARIAN CALL SETS UP WARNING
In last week’s blog we expressed our contrarian view that the next move of the US stock market was up. On Friday afternoon the market shot up and was able to keep most of its gains by the close. Even when flipping coins, the odds of a trend continuing or reversing does not change. However, as a contrarian I am worried about being successively right. (In the early 1960s I was right in choosing specific stocks six times in a row; it ruined me in terms of the only real product of the stock market = humility. Hopefully, I have fully recovered.)

In addition to not trusting in a continuation of a trend, there are two signs that should sound some caution. The first deals with the difference in outlook of investors vs. speculators. In an over-simplification one could suggest that the bulk of the money invested in New York Stock Exchange stocks is for investment, while the bulk of the money invested in NASDAQ stocks is more speculative short-term. In the week ended Friday, the number of new lows on the NYSE was 147 vs. 302 for the NASDAQ.  Part of the reason for this dichotomy is that the focus of investment leadership may have changed. Using mutual fund performance averages for the week ended Thursday, before the sharp gain on Friday, the best category average return was achieved by World Equity funds +0.81%, which beat the return of +0.52% for US Diversified Equity funds. The average sector funds declined slightly -0.04%. Expanding the performance lens to the month of September, I looked selectively at the performance of some T. Rowe Price funds (*) to get a clue as to the future direction from the following list:

                            September 
Fund                       Performance
Financial Services            +3.36%
New Asia                      +3.15
New Era                       +2.66
Emerging Market Stock         +2.25
Growth Stock                  –0.99

The two leading sectors in the Financial Services fund were banks and insurance, both of which trailed earlier in the year. New Asia is heavily invested in China and India. New Era was a fund designed by Mr. Price himself, to serve as an inflation protected portfolio invested in energy and other commodity related issues. The Growth Stock fund is led by FAANG stocks and a small position in pre-IPO investments. I have hedged our larger positions in Growth Stock and similar funds with international funds, inflation sensitive funds, financial service funds and some stocks. The purpose of hedging is to have some relative winners when long-term, attractive growth stock investments, are experiencing difficulties in the short-term.

(*) Owned in our private Financial Services Fund and in personal accounts.

The second short-term factor is that the overall US stock market, as currently priced, is clearly in the middle of its valuation range. The following statistics are in general flat with a year ago:

                        Current     Year Ago
Indicator               Reading     Reading
DJIA Yield               2.20%       2.19%
S&P 500 Yield            2.00%       1.99%
Market/Book - DJIA       4.12x       4.09x
Market/Book - S&P 500    3.49x       3.35x
Consumer Prices         +1.74%      +1.74%
Inflation               +1.70%      +1.70%

Perhaps the most reassuring indicator is a contrarian one. The current American Association of Individual Investor's weekly sample survey has a bearish reading of 44%. As noted in prior blogs, readings over 40% are extremely rare. Three weeks ago this number was 33%, demonstrating its volatility.

SHORT-TERM WARNING
We may create an important barrier to future higher prices if within a reasonably short period we do not see record price levels with expanding volume.

• Some may view multiple attempts to achieve new highs as a sign of a market top after rising for more than ten years. 
• Many stock holders disappointed with the lack of progress in their particular selections may see the current price level as a good exiting opportunity. 
• From an analytical viewpoint, if the seller’s volume is larger than the buyer’s appetite, near-term prices will decline. I emphasize near-term because sellers are often sold out bulls, who feel compelled to re-enter the market regardless of price for fear of missing out (FOMO).

COLUMBUS DAY LESSONS FOR ESG INVESTMENTS BY INSTITUTIONS
Most Americans have been brought up to celebrate Columbus Day, “the discovery of America”. They are familiar with the story of Christopher Columbus who convinced the Queen of Spain to use her jewels to pay for his three ships. These ships set off to find a new route to India and found an island in the Caribbean instead. He is celebrated for his persistence and courage to go where nobody had reportedly gone before. Instead of this tale being taught in elementary schools, the real story should be taught in business schools, particularly in advanced investment and marketing classes. (The latter has to do with one of America’s great resources, the ability to sell myths.) The real story is very different than the one presented to children.

THE REAL STORY
Spain’s main competitor and neighbor was Portugal. The king of Portugal was known as Henry, The Navigator.  He funded a series of voyages along the African coast and eventually had one of his ships round the Cape of Good Hope at the southern tip of the continent. Later, his ships landed in India and he was able to set up the spice trade. In the time of no refrigeration spices were extremely valuable in Europe. They had learned from Marco Polo that the addition of spices preserved the taste of meat.

When Columbus was attempting to raise money for his venture, Spain was in the midst of the forced conversion or expulsion of Jews. Not only was the Inquisition expensive, but it wiped out much of the merchant class in the country. The Queen, recognizing the need to divert attention from the expulsion and poor state of its economy, found in Columbus a “pigeon”, or a willing accomplice.

Columbus today would be called a skilled marketer with a smattering of scientific knowledge. Most other explorative voyages were done with a single ship, not three. So, like most marketeers, Columbus overspent. He was not a good manager or leader, suffering a mutiny and the loss of one of his ships. When he landed he did not know where and what he brought back was of little economic value. But like a good marketer, he was able to raise funding for two additional voyages.

In one respect Spain got very little from its investment in the spice trade. However, Spain got a great deal from its discovery of gold and silver, in countries with weak militaries. Spain, along with Portugal, seized Latin America and parts of what is now the US. (Interesting enough, the smaller of the two occupiers got the biggest piece of South America, Brazil.) In some respects, the rest of Europe paid for Spain’s success. The gold from Latin America created two hundred years of inflation and shifted the political power bases within Europe. Perhaps due to inflation, other European countries avoided funding exploration and development directly, licensing private companies to do it for them instead. The Dutch and English were particularly successful, their effort lasting longer than that of the Spanish.

COLUMBUS AND ESG INVESTING BY INSTITUTIONS
ESG is a series of views for the protection and improvement of the world. ESG stands for Environmental, Social and Governance, which some investment institutions impose on businesses, not governments. They hope to shame, or through the use of proxies, force businesses to improve their conduct. These improvements include how companies treat the environment, how they interact with their communities and workers, and the composition their boards and management. They do not appear to be concerned with the cost of their actions, which will be felt by shareholders and customers. One example is the use of tax subsidies to lower the initial cost of electric cars. There is no concern that the electricity used, particularly in China, comes from burning coal to generate electricity, or that these vehicles will require fewer workers to build or maintain. This is not to say that ESG issues should not be addressed, but the total cost for all stakeholders needs to be understood and managed.

For proponents of ESG they should consider a possible parallel with the lessons of Columbus. Both Spain in its time and the boards of various fiduciary institutions today have looked for things that do not exist in reality:

• Both have spent other people’s money without the direct authorization of the beneficiaries 
• Both were exposed to some very successful marketing
• Both needed to focus attention away from a world of low returns
• Neither wanted to turn over development to private enterprise, with their history of frequent and periodic measurement, and audits
• Both appear to have been unconcerned with the consequences of their effect on others

This is not to downplay the need for answers to society’s problems, but there is a concern about the instruments being used.



Question: 
What are your thoughts about the short-term outlook for the market or the Columbus Day lessons?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/contrarian-bets-and-other-risks-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/09/mixed-near-term-after-recession.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/09/capital-cycles-changing-weekly-blog-595.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reluctant Excuses: TINA to FOMO; Good News: Historical Trends to Apple Store; Accelerating Momentum: Incomplete - Weekly Blog # 505

Introduction to FOMO

Changing sentiment appears to be a much stronger force than earnings taking the stock market higher. A couple of years ago, investors reluctantly were buying equities in the face of expected rising interest rates, relatively slow earnings growth, and expected political turmoil. Their excuse for this questionable decision was TINA, There Is No Alternative. Over the last fourteen months this excuse has given way to another symbolic abbreviation FOMO, Fear Of Missing Out. During these last fourteen months and the first week of January, 2018, the S&P 500 has not had a single month decline. Momentum has become the mantra for the buyers as well as the larger audience of holders. In the last calendar year the leading investment performance factor within the S&P 500 universe has been the momentum stocks that gained 28.27%.

Will it Continue?

This week we had two very insightful experts publish their views of the year ahead with clues beyond. Byron Wien published his annual ten surprises that he believes have at least a 50% chance of happening and that his wide circle of global contacts believe have less than a 33% of happening. One of his surprises is that the market will take a 10% correction during the year. He thinks that a recession will not surprise us until at least 2019.  Further he recognizes that there may well be other surprises during the year that none are expecting. Nevertheless, one could interpret his views that stocks markets in general will be well behaved.

The second very worthwhile piece published this week was by Jeremy Grantham of GMO. Jeremy by nature tends to be on the bearish side. Thus it is a bit surprising that he entitles his piece “Bracing Yourself for a Possible Near-Term Melt-Up.” While he does acknowledge that we could have a 20% decline that he believes would be helpful, he also does not see a near-term recession. Like Byron he sees the S&P 500 as going well into the 3000 territory. B/t/w, his firm has an equity fund that is among the leaders in the institutional league.

The odds are that these two gentlemen will prove to be correct and I hope so. However, when I mention odds I am force to think of the lessons that my experience bought at the major New York racetracks which can be briefly summarized as follows:

1.  Past performance is good to organize one’s memory, but can be less useful in predicting the future.

2.  Each race (Market) is different with different horses and conditions.

3.  Different odds lead to different earnings.

4.  It is not the number of wins that counts, but the size of winnings taken away.

 5.  As a contrarian one can win more money by occasionally betting against the crowd.

Good News: Historical Trends to Apple Store

One of the reasons to own rather than loan is that over long periods of time human life is generally getting better. Most of the time we don’t get this message from our political leaders and their supporting pundits. If there weren’t problems to be addressed we might not tolerate governments and their expenses. Thus, we do not see a lot of publicity about the long-term progress we have made some of which from an article by Max Roser can be shown below:

·       Since 1990 there have been 130,000 people fewer in extreme poverty every day.

·       Globally in 1800 there were fewer than 100 million that could read. Today 4.6 Billion can read.

·       In 1800, 43% of the newborns didn’t see their fifth birthday. In 2015 child mortality was down to 4.3%. Improved health and nutrition has made us taller and smarter.

·       These and other positive trends are continuing and accelerating.

Part of the reasons for this progress is due to technology which marches to its own drummer. Technology itself is driven by the desire for increased profit. I refer to profit not in an accounting or monetary sense, but a desire to improve one’s own life, often to improve the lives of ones for which the individual cares.

This thought occurred to me this weekend when I accompanied my wife to the Apple Store at The Mall at Short Hills. It was by far the busiest store in the mall with both customers, salespeople, support staff, and in effect, trainers. It only took a little more than an hour to exchange her watch for a different model and synchronized it with her iPhone. During that time I had a chance to look at a very diversified group of customers waiting patiently to be served and an equally diverse sales and service group on a packed sales floor. 

What occurred to me is that we were experiencing an ecosystem which is building loyalty and a knowledge base both for customers and a helpful, well-trained sales force. In many ways each person in the store was looking for ways to improve his or her condition in a personally profitable way. (The visit made me happy that I have been a very long-term shareholder in Apple and reinforced my faith in their eco-system in spite of periodic hardware and software glitches.) 

The potential of Apple and its good competitors to deliver very useful products and services addressing many of our unmet needs suggests to me the rate of human progress will accelerate in the years ahead and will probably benefit my grandchildren, great grandchildren and their children.

  

Accelerating Momentum: Incomplete

In a market that relies on sentiment to drive its momentum, one can not wait on published financial and economic results. One should be paying attention to what consumers at all levels and investors are doing as well as saying. Recently I have been commenting on the AAII weekly survey of a sample of its members. As I have said previously, a normal distribution of the individuals' opinion is roughly 40% bullish and 30% each for neutral and bearish. This week the bullish reading exceeded 59% and the bearish number was about 15%.Two weeks ago the numbers were 50% and 25% respectively. Clearly a symptom of accelerating momentum

The siren of the rising stock market has not sucked in all the available money that is fearful of missing out. The banks (particularly the small and regional banks) have not lost cash deposits to the stock market. As a matter of fact, this week the average money market account dropped its rate to 0.30% from 0.33% the week before. The drop may be caused by less demand for loans or possibly that some banks were bulking up their cash items for year-end statement purposes.

Some market observers and I are carefully watching the yields on treasuries. Each major stock market decline had rising yields as money sought safety away from actual or perceived credit risks. Some feel a ten year yield above 2.50% could be alarming.

What to Do?

If economist Jeremy Grantham is correct that we are in a “melt-up” and there will be a 20% decline before the eventual recession which could trigger a bigger decline one may want to shift some of one’s equity positions into highest available quality. That would not have hurt you too badly in 2017 when the quality component in the S&P 500 gained 19.51%.

At this time large market caps with reasonable balance sheets yield above the ten year treasury. Not a great deal of actively managed investors and high market liquidity can be used as bond substitutes. Because we can always be surprised I would own a bunch of these. They may include AT&T, GM and GE plus a few others. If one becomes addicted to investing in quality stocks for the long run, there are more in the small cap arena than elsewhere, but these are for investing not cyclical trading.

Question of the Week: Do you agree or disagree with my analysis?     

__________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission

The Critical Difference Between Experienced and Expert

Selecting winners is part of my game. I am essentially a student of other's investment experience. The general failures to be ready for Brexit and the success of extreme politicians is a wake up call to understand the critical difference between experience and expertise which are also found in the art form of selecting long-term investment winners.

I have spent many enjoyable hours attending classical musical concerts of the New Jersey Symphony Orchestra and other great orchestras and too many painful hours at Operas. Both of these are experiences, but in no way could I become a professional musician. Time spent on an activity lengthens one’s memory of experiences.  Note that the combination of a great orchestra leader and a great orchestra can make the rehearing of a familiar piece seem new and exciting.

We never know what the future brings to us. Will it be an exact repeat of the past or something quite different? The difference in terms of satisfaction and progress can be quite different. Thus we build portfolios of mutual funds and other managers that have experienced experts who have the wisdom to recognize that something is quite different than the past. 

Experienced, Not Expert

The so-called "experts" who predicted the English would vote to remain within the EU and the political pundits who had extreme confidence that the central political forces would keep centralists in political power proved to be experienced not experts. They are not alone in this distinction. Today numerous professional investors including many of the bright analysts and portfolio managers that I have known for over fifty years are very frustrated by the current stock and bond markets. One regularly hears that this is the most unloved bull market. Based on past experience, the current levels are not only unattractive but close to being beyond "nosebleed" levels because past standard ratios are flashing danger signals. The reasons they stay invested are the two abbreviations “TINA” and “FOMO.” (There Is No Alternative and Fear Of Missing Out.)

I like attending repeat performances of music, politics, and investments. I get unnerved with the new, that for which we are not prepared.

Perhaps sharing a Marine Corps tradition with my battle trained Marine Recon. (Reconnaissance) brother has caused me to expect and look for change. In addition, being a senior trustee of what has been recognized as the world's leading research university, Caltech, has very much focused me on looking forward to dramatic changes.

Dr. Simon Ramo

An example of the type of leaders that Caltech has produced is Si Ramo who was entrusted by the US government along with his partner to create a company that developed the intercontinental ballistic missiles which not only gave us many years of strategic security but was an important contributor to our space program. This past week the University, where he was a trustee, celebrated his life having recently died at 103. 

As Dr. Ramo was a globalist, an entrepreneur as well as a member of Caltech's investment committee he might well had noticed that in the first half of 2016 the S&P500  had a small gain of +2.69%,  where Brazilian Dividend Aristocrats were up +82.34% and an index of Low volatility Bovespa stocks were up +77.74%.  Not only did some Latin American stocks do well but many Canadian stocks were up 20% or more. I believe he might have brought up to the investment committee whether these results were just recoveries from deeply depressed markets or had some future portents.

Let me give examples of a very successful experienced portfolio manager with a leading ten plus year record and a single stock that proved that most investors were not the experts that they thought they were.

Many Thought He Was a Great Manager

In the 1960s there was a mutual fund manager whose picture was on various magazine front covers and was world renowned. I studied his portfolio over the years. With rare exception he picked stocks from a list of 120 large cap stocks usually having a portfolio with a list of 60 names. His record was such that he was able to leave one of the strongest mutual fund management houses and start his own fund company that subsequently went public. In the 1970s the market changed as did the market structure and in the end his company disappeared. My analysis is that he was well experienced for the markets of his time, but did not have the expertise to recognize the changes that were occurring or know how to play the new game. (Sound familiar?)

The single stock was one that could well become an entire course in a business school. Started in a garage, the company produced a differently focused computer and developed many new pioneering products, thus creating new market segments over several year, but its financial picture suggested that probably it would go bankrupt.  Its president was fired. Over the next several years he learned to be a businessman and a technological leader and his newly founded company was acquired to bring him back to the company he founded. 

Over the next two decades the company created new products for markets that didn't exist until the new products opened the doors to new markets. As the company became recognized for its technological, stylistic, and business successes, it became the single most valuable company in the world's stock market. This was surprising to many professional investors who came to the party late and as often happens sold out when normal cyclical patterns emerge.

This month, while down from record levels, its earnings came in better than was expected by the virtual cottage industry that now follows the stock. Thanks to dumb luck I have owned a few shares of Apple since the 1970s in part because of the life-changing attitude that my late daughter who was learning-disabled daughter had with the Apple II computer I bought her. She enjoyed working on a device that was intuitive and patient as well as forgiving. The ability to change people's lives suggested to me that this was something different than a number of other computer companies that have subsequently disappeared.

Both of these examples illustrate the difference between experienced and expertise. (Not mine, but Steve Jobs and Tim Cook.)

To some degree we are all captives of our and other’s experiences. However, as investors we should be looking forward to finding elements of expertise.

Are you doing this, and will you share how you are doing it? 

_________________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com .

Copyright © 2008 - 2016

A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.