Showing posts with label Compounding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Compounding. Show all posts

Sunday, January 8, 2023

Next Election vs. Future Generations - Weekly Blog # 766

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Next Election vs. Future Generations

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

  

  

Time Horizons

Behavioral, political, and investment strategies should be selected based on a measurement period, acceptance of errors, and compound returns. While rarely identified, these three factors often control the success of a chosen strategy.

 

Many people are currently very short term oriented, distinct from the expressed time frame driving the Founding Fathers of the US expressed in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

 

Four examples of this shortened time focus are:

1.  Selection of Leaders in political, military, health, and corporate sectors. We unfortunately pick leaders with political skills rather than courage to lead in a different direction, with the focus is on the next election or selection. Both Henry Kissinger and Jaime Dimon have written about the lack of foresight in the world’s political and business leadership. (I would slightly disagree. Autocratic leaders seem to be playing chess rather than checkers, which is what our elected or selected leaders are doing.)

 

2.  As revealed in the recent “Varsity Blues” scandal, where some rich parents made illegal payments to get their children into well-known Universities. Their apparent motives were intended to ensure their young got admitted to these schools for bragging rights, while others utilized “legacy rights” at their own alma mater to achieve the same result. (That one’s children do not possess the appropriate credentials to be accepted into these designated schools should have been addressed years ago.)

 

3.  Almost all investment performance data in the press focuses on annual or shorter time periods. This often mirrors the investment focus of many in selecting a fund or manager. (While I can’t predict winners in future markets, I am aware that the poorest performing advisors can occasionally produce the best results in  future periods by recapturing some of the prior lost performance.)

 

4.  On Friday the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) gained some 700 points. Supposedly this was because of the questionable Department of Labor establishment survey which showed a higher number of workers than expected. (There was almost no coverage showing that only 6 out of 10 employable workers were on the job. For many years, countries with 7 out of 10 workers employed were considered the better locations for investing.)

 

Contrarian Views

The history of market prices around the world suggests that the biggest gains come from a radical change of opinion on the future performance of various securities.

 

After 15 years of the US stock market being home to many of the big winners, there is some sentiment that more global oriented companies will be winners.

 

Markets don’t have to follow nice, neat calendar periods. In the US, stock prices generally rose in October and November then declined a bit in December. It is quite possible that November represented the end of the recovery period that started in June. Suggesting Friday’s gain won’t be sustained for the month.

 

Only 10 out of 104 mutual fund equity-oriented sector averages rose in December. Utilizing securities data on a national basis, only China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Thailand gained over 1% (listed in performance order).

 

Winning the Long Game

One of the long-term reasons mutual fund investing performs better than many managed accounts with individual securities is that the fund industry developed an easy process of reinvesting distributions of income and capital gains. A number of large companies had similar reinvestment procedures in the past, although they were dropped due to lack of interest.

 

One of the lessons learned from the thrift industry is that through the magic of compounding a series of small contributions can produce meaningful returns over 12 to 30 years, particularly in a market of generally rising prices where fund holders stay in the product.   


It is often the small and simple things that lead to investment success: having patience, a long-term time horizon, taking as much emotion as possible out of the investment process, not following the herd and looking for opportunities elsewhere. While these items are simple attitudes, they are often difficult to implement in practice. Investing is an artform; therefore, one should allow for mistakes without deviating from good strategies.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bear Market, Recessions, Reinvestment - Weekly Blog # 765

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Week in Conflict Leads to Buy List - Weekly blog # 764

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: What does your 4.0 Profile Tell You? - Weekly Blog # 763

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2022

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

Sunday, August 21, 2022

Length of Stay Contributes to Performance - Weekly blog # 747

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Length of Stay Contributes to Performance

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

    

 

     

Blog Focus

Most investment-oriented blogs focus on the selection of individual securities or funds/advisors. I am uncomfortable with crowded fields or markets, believing returns are relatively low when they are correct.

 

I am blessed to be part of an informal group of still active investors, who are or were professional analysts, portfolio managers, and institutional salespeople. For most of my professional life I have studied and used mutual funds and management companies/advisors. These are the results I study.

 

In reviewing my peers’ and other performance records, I am impressed that a large portion of their very successful records were produced by holding securities and other relationships for many years.

 

Holdings held 25 years or more have produced remarkably good performance, with some gains 100X or more their original cost. These gains were achieved by careful initial selection and maintenance of the positions, hopefully reinvesting distributions over an extended period.

 

Recognizing the benefit of compounding returns has led me to subdivide portfolios into length-of-stay (LOS) buckets.

 

While investment and economic cycles don’t overlap or fit concisely within US presidential terms, they are reasonable approximations of most major up and down US stock market phases.

 

Consequently, I take the point of view that periods under five years require superior trading, not investment skill. At this time, which appears to be between a long bull market and a shorter bear market, the five-year average compound growth rate of 7,433 US Diversified Equity Mutual Funds serves as a useful comparison for the next five years without making any predictions.

 

The five-year weighted (by performance) average return through last Thursday was 11.98%. Perhaps more significant was the median return of 10.04%. (Better performing funds raise the average result when compared to the absolute median result. I am more comfortable using the median for planning purposes. It is also closer to the historic return of the S&P 500 since 1926.)

 

A recent discussion with a leading energy analyst concerning Berkshire Hathaway’s interest in Occidental Petroleum confirmed that it is reasonable to expect its stock return of 8% for the next five years. As this is a holding in our personal and managed accounts, I felt it was a good alternative to Berkshire’s cash position, especially in view of the five-year returns mentioned above.

 


L.O.S. Impacts Choice of Value vs Growth

Investment theory is based on fair value being the highest price a knowledgeable buyer would pay. Consequently, the only time you should buy an investment is when it trades at a discount to fair value. A value investor seeks a position selling below the price of a company’s products or services. The elapsed time is usually small and is often dependent on an economic cycle or commodity price change. Most value investors expect this to occur within five years.

 

Typically, a growth investor has a different mathematical approach. Growth usually infers a decline in the price a company sells its products or services as demand grows. This could take many years.

 

When DuPont viewed by itself as a growth company it was willing to build an expensive chemical plant to develop the market for its merchandise. It was willing to wait twenty years to reach an overall breakeven level. It expected it to be followed by very profitable years.

 

Value investors have a relatively short-length-of-stay and expect lower volatility than growth investors. However, most accounts able to earn many multiples of their initial investment have tended to be growth oriented.

 


Current Market

Current market leadership to mid-June has exhibited a relatively short-length-of-stay orientation based on an anticipated recovery in price or demand levels.

 

In the past, mutual funds experienced historic net redemptions when the expected period of investment was complete. This was on average 13 years.

 

With the switch to shorter term wealth management approaches, the new favored sales vehicle seems to be indexed Exchange Traded Funds. This is likely to continue to make markets more volatile.

 

Leading corporate managers by contrast are betting on growth. They expect major changes in how investors will do things in the future.

 

Last week we mentioned Aetna’s recognition of the change in healthcare delivery through CVS Health. In a somewhat similar fashion, Amazon is also looking to provide healthcare directly through a new venture.

 

Apple’s new products and policies are likely to generate dramatic changes in a number of markets

.

We are in a volatile period. In last week’s blog I noted that the vast majority of the WSJ weekly prices showed gains, with the two largest declines being the Wall Street Journal dollar index and the Russian Ruble. This week the two largest gainers were the two biggest laggards of the prior week, whereas the bulk of the prices declined.

 


Conclusion

Traders who can use volatility to their benefit should continue to do this. However, relatively few have these skills.

 

Those with patience willing to view the future as offering opportunities for extraordinary gains and have patience should invest for growth.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/08/time-to-prune-weekly-blog-746.htm

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/time-to-be-contrary-weekly-blog-741.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.