Are Investors Taking Too Much Investment Risk? - Weekly Blog # 713

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Are Investors Taking Too Much Investment Risk?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

One can rarely earn investment gains without taking investment risks. Investors often believe they imperil too much for the risk assumed. This view has led Lee Cooperman to comment that he is a fully invested bear. (He is counting on his timing and trading skills to save his capital) I am in a somewhat similar position in my investment account, which excludes my “burn-rate” and personal future generation endowment accounts.

Focusing on my operating investment accounts I wonder if I am taking too much near-term investment risk, as I do not believe I have sufficient trading skills and expect to be premature. The best way for me to escape a major decline might be to reduce the premature gap from “the top”. The way to do that is to recognize the excessive investment performance achieved by others as a precursor to a massive decline. Prior road trips with a young family echo in my mind, “are we there yet?”.

Listed below are an increasing number of signs of excessive investment performance:

1. Most diversified equity mutual funds produced a 20% gain for 2021, with some professionally managed investment accounts producing returns of 30% or better. History suggests that this is unusual and characteristic of an approaching top.
2. The types of stocks generating above average momentum are like those we have seen in the mid to late stages of a bull market. While stock market cycles and economic cycles don’t have to be coincident, the major ones usually are.
3. The pandemic’s economic cycle impact is unknown. In a normal investment cycle, it would either be the equivalent of an investment “bear market”, or as they say at “the track”, an aberration that should be disregarded. There is reason to disregard the impact of the pandemic, but market leadership does not look like the beginning of a new “bull market”. If we are not in a new bull market, we are in an aging expansion approaching ten years. Bull markets are not closely tied to an economic cycle, but there is something of an echo effect.
4. For some time, the predictive power of reported earnings per share has deteriorated, due to changes in accounting and regulatory rules. From a long-term investment perspective, I prefer to focus on aggregate pretax operating net income, which is not marred by non-operating net interest earnings and changes in share counts. I further attempt to back out the impact of changes in accounting rules, including recognition of depreciation and amortization.
5. We have entered a period of accelerating inflation, which needs to be considered when attempting to predict earnings power generation. This is particularly important in companies reporting significantly larger rises in net income than sales. There are many reasons for this, including operating leverage, with most of the gains coming from the exercise of pricing power to offset inflation. Earnings so generated, are not usually the source of future earnings gains.
6. There are lots of good investment managers, but some with “hot performance numbers” appear to have unsound analytical backing and may be generating gains from skilled market analysis. This is difficult to maintain and is what we used to call “racing luck”.

I am not attempting to precisely predict the future. What I am attempting to do as a good pilot is avoid air pockets that can cause a sudden drop in altitude or permanent loss of capital. 

After The Fall

To the best of my knowledge there has never been an active market that did not have intermittent declines. I therefore have a high level of confidence that at some point there will be future declines in all markets I’m invested in. 

There are two causes for wars, underlying and immediate. Analysts are unlikely to identify immediate causes beforehand but should be able to spot many of the underlying causes. Most of the causes are essentially an ongoing change in the perceived level of competition. When enough power has shifts to one side, the situation is fraught with danger. The leader sees an opportunity to further increase its power and the loser fears further loss of power. Either side may choose to react to this growing disequilibrium. I suggest the growing gap in relative safety measures are such that it is reasonable to fear some unplanned explosions.

 Whatever happens, it is our responsibility as fiduciaries to invest before, during, and after the fall. This plays to our preferred method of investing in stocks, which is through portfolios of mutual funds, mostly somewhat diversified. In preparation for this task, I read the diverse views of successful fund managers. The goal is to build focused portfolio of funds that think differently. This holiday week I had more time than usual to read what managers were thinking about the longer-term future. Two long-term very successful managers produced reports that should earn their place in equity fund portfolios, as described below:

The Capital Group published a 2022 Outlook on the “Long-term perspective on markets and economies”, which had the following highlights:

1. Market leadership is currently the same as it was before the pandemic. (This is an indication of a continuing long bull market)
2. Global economic growth is slowing, particularly in China. (Valuations have expanded, particularly under the influence of buybacks and M&A activity.)
3. Inflation should persist longer than expected, due to broken supply chains, shortages of materials, and more importantly of competent employees, particularly at the trained supervisory level.) Nevertheless, Capital believes inflation will not rise to the double-digit levels of the 1970s. In most inflationary periods stock and bond prices rose.
4. A good time to focus on stock selection by looking for pricing power, sustainable growth, and rising dividends.
5. Expect increased volatility in this midterm election year. (Perhaps this view is best expressed in the firm’s Growth Fund of America, ranked 17th of top 25 mutual funds year to date and the single best for the week ended December 23rd, gaining +3.55% vs +1.25% for the Vanguard 500 index fund. (Compared to many other growth funds, this multimanager vehicle is more risk aware.)

The other fund management group that has produced thoughtful pieces is the London based Marathon Asset Management. They are a successful global investor with a sizable sub-advisor and separate account business in the US. What distinguishes their thinking is their focus on the supply side of the equation, whereas almost all the other investment managers first focus on the changing levels of demand for a company’s products and services. This tends to put them earlier in the timing of the investment cycle. Their portfolios tend to look like those of a value investor, making Marathon a good investment diversifier in an otherwise growth-oriented portfolio. The following are some of their investment ideas:

1. Moody’s and S&P Global are viewed as an oligopoly taking fees for assessing credit instruments. (This is not completely accurate as there are a number of smaller credit tracking agencies, both in the US and elsewhere. What makes them attractive businesses is their ability to access a small increase in prices each year, as well as a fluctuating demand level. (At least I hope so, as both are in accounts I manage, and in a somewhat similar position is Fair Isaac, which provides FICO credit ratings on 99% of US credit securitizations.)
2. With a limited number of new copper mines coming on stream and local governments pushing tax collections, the price of copper is rising. It will probably rise much further as auto production moves to battery electric vehicles (BEV) from internal combustion engines. BEVs, which use roughly 80 lbs. vs 20 lbs. of copper per vehicle.
3. “Private equity will face major headwinds in a governance play with little leverage as topping” (This is another set of headwinds as it is an overcrowded area, with entry prices expected to rise and provisions expected to decline.) “Growth valuations are based on visibility, the ability to push out time horizons ten or twenty years into the future with sufficient certainty to justify paying for that outcome, a very difficult call in a new world based on political whims.”
4. Japan has not adopted the US approach to corporate governance and has limited M&A activity and corporate raids. Stock options are evolving, with more shareholder friendly conditions. (A number of global investors, including Lazard, have a long-term favorable view of Japan, despite its recent economic record. Japan is becoming a more needed US ally, both militarily and economically.)

Next week I hope to devote the blog to some things I and other investors have learned (or relearned) in 2021. Please send me an email on what should be included in the list.    

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/selections-weekly-blog-710.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/11/investors-be-alert-to-novembers-risk.html Mike Lipper's Blog: 

Request to subscribers

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.