Europeans Win, Experts Lose, Trading Opportunity vs.1848

Introduction

The essential difference between market followers and sound analysts is the former follow short-term momentum and the latter long-term directional changes. I embrace the second responsibility. Brexit, in my opinion, is the beginning milestone on the march to an era of more freedom of consumption and investment which will lead to better lives for many Europeans. Note I am focusing on people not present political countries.

The Perils of Over-Confidence

The focus on the needs and desires of most people is exactly what the expert class was not doing. They did not see or hear what the working class and much of the middle class were saying. The colossal surprise of the upset is only a surprise in that the expert classes of economists, political scientists, politicians, portfolio managers, senior investment people and media pundits had never considered that they were wrong. They had no plan “B.” In the US Marine Corps young officers are instructed you will only be judged on what you execute which will largely be plans “B,C,D, E, or F.”

This tendency of overconfidence will be part of a panel discussion this week at the New York Society of Securities Analysts celebrating the work of Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing. At the meeting I will be focusing on mistakes investors make keying off some of the mistakes that Berkshire Hathaway has made over the years. I have been asked about the single biggest cause of professional investment mistakes. I will discuss the overconfidence which has led to sizable losses. A similar pattern was in evidence in the London approach to Brexit. 

What Actually Happened: A tale of Three Countries

In Great Britain the London-centric experts thought the campaign would be won focusing on the fear of economic disruption. They were not listening to the people of the North of England and Wales who were primarily concerned with the loss of national sovereignty in terms of immigration and Brussels’ determined justice and procedures. These working classes and much of the middle class were fed up with what they perceived was likely to happen to them.  

One of the signs of this great division with those who wished to remain is the number of voting districts where the winning side polled more than 60%. We are used to seeing a split in many voting areas similar to the final 52/48%. The wider spread indicates to me that both sides were effectively only talking to their own and not engaging with the sizable undecided or opposed. The London-centric people initially bet over 90% of the money with the book makers that they would win only in the last few hours of the referendum, bet 90% on Brexit. (Too bad the Londoners didn’t know their history. More on that later.) Since the bulk of the more active institutional and trading money is intellectually based in London, over the preceding days they were heavily buying securities and sending similar thoughts to other markets. Interesting when the shock of the results became clear, the UK stock market declined one of the smaller falls in the world in part because only 35.5% of the indices’ revenues were domestic to the UK.

German investors suffered a 12% decline in part because 72.4% of their revenues are international in scope. One corollary measure is in the US, the Vanguard Europe ETF fell 11.3% as noted by my friend Jason Zweig.

In the US with approximately 70% of our revenues produced domestically, the main stock averages fell in the neighborhood of 3%.

This needs to be put into perspective. First, the decline essentially corrected the last several days’ rise based on our trading fraternity believing what they were hearing from London as well as significant short covering by hedge funds and similar traders. I believe the over 600 point fall in the Dow Jones Industrial Average was caused by the absence of short covering and algorithm-driven quant funds that sold as various price levels were violated. People at JP Morgan believe that from this source some $25 billion dollars were thrown on the market. If there is a continuation of the sharp decline they are looking for up to $300 billion more to be added to the market.

For those of a trading mentality I suggest at some point a near-term bottom will be reached, possibly on Monday. Current prices for many securities are back down to the bottom of their recent trading ranges which could well hold. If these trading bottoms do not hold further, declines will find other bottoms. Whenever the bottoms are found, subsequent rises could be dramatic because of the absence of positioning capital on trading desks.

While I recognize a potential trading opportunity, at the moment I do not see a substantial reason to change fundamental investment strategy. In terms of our four chamber TIMESPAN L PORTFOLIOS^® I might adjust the second chamber or the Replenishment Portfolio’s equity trading account to either take advantage of some cheaper merchandise or reducing risk if there are more violations of support levels. I would not change either the Endowment or Legacy Portfolios.

Londoners Had the Answer

The intelligentsia in London had the answer if they knew where to look. I do not know whether or not the restaurant that was in the downstairs floor of the residence of Karl Marx is still functioning. One evening my wife Ruth and I climbed the rickety stairs to his apartment which still had no electricity. At the request of the German Communist Party, Karl Marx authored the Communist Manifesto in early 1848. (A side note: because of his subversive activities in Europe he was never allowed to become an English citizen even though he was buried there.) He believed that it was in England that the revolution of the proletariat would begin because of its class structure.

1848

The main reason to focus on Karl Marx is the year 1848. This was the year of some 50 revolts by the working and middle classes throughout Europe and Latin America. These brought down a number of governments including in France. There was widespread dissatisfaction with the political leadership. Nationalism was on the rise in France, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark and Italy among other places. The violence of the revolts and the desperation of the people led to massive migration into “the new world” which in one generation proved to be a major brain drain. Lenin summed up what happened. “There are decades when nothing happens and there are weeks when decades happen.” (Courtesy of John Mauldin)

Perhaps the bureaucrats in Brussels and the current political leaders on the Continent are now seeing the risk to their structure. As is natural their first instinct is to punish the interloper, the second is to become defensive and the third hopefully to negotiate and evolve. Possibly Dr. Brendan Brown of Mitsubishi UFJ Securities is correct when he says. “The referendum result marks the start of A European journey out of a failed EU.  Britain is in the lead…There are serious grounds for hope (for) greater economic and political freedoms, prosperity and European harmony.” Greater Europe has for centuries developed official and more informal trade patterns that has produced satisfactory results both in peace and war and I would expect that to continue. In that light I believe that Europeans need the British as much if not more than the British need various European elected and non-elected states.

What to Do?

Many of the better US managed international funds have significant portions of their portfolios invested in Europe. I suspect over time these will be good investments and could find places within sound Endowment and Legacy Portfolios. For those whose preference is individual financial services securities, on a long-term basis they may wish to examine INVESCO, Franklin Resources, and Goldman Sachs all three are long term positions in our private financial services funds and have been under pressure recently. There are similar long-term attractive non-US domiciled financial service companies that I will be happy to discuss with our readers.

_________________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2016

A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Beyond Near Term Investing: How Much For Brains?

Luckily for me and I hope for you, thoughts once launched continue under development as people react and additional information becomes available. I am very blessed as I am regularly in receipt of many stimulating investment papers and articles of importance.

Last week’s blog post focused on the relative value of my personal accounts' 40%+ investment allocation outside the US and the expenditures to support education for various members of my family.

This week I was privileged to read three articles and a personal email that contributed considerably more depth to these thoughts.

Top Test Scores From Shanghai Surprise Educators

The above was the headline in an attachment to the always interesting, thought provoking and occasionally correct “Ten Surprises” by Byron Wien of Blackstone. (Disclosure: I have known Byron for the more than 50 years and have served on boards with him.) One of the reasons Byron was pessimistic long term as to the future of the US was the poor test scores earned by 15 year-olds in the US relative to others around the world in 2009. The tests were given in Science, Reading and Math. In each case, the United States was far from a leader, above average in Science and Reading but below average in Math. There were thirteen countries that did better than the US students in all three tests. In order of their Math rank they were: China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, Finland, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Belgium, Australia, and Estonia. (I will be happy to supply my work sheet on these results if you contact me.)

Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior

Amy Chua, a professor at the Yale Law School wrote the above titled article for the Wall Street Journal. The article stressed the very rigorous discipline Ms. Chua applies to her two daughters, not allowing any outside activities and focusing all of their attention on repeated or rote work. For the daughters and their Mother the long focused practice sessions seem to have worked.

Rereading the list of superior test-taking countries, I can not avoid the recognition that the first four locations had strong Asian mothers present. One can add the seventh place Japan to this list of enforcers of scholastic discipline. There were a number of western countries that also did well, at least three of these have long winters which are good for long study hours. I must admit as a “civilian Marine,” (the newly coined term for those who no longer wear the uniform), the use of rigorous discipline and working during dark hours rings true to me.

Over the years I have had successful investment experiences in practically every one of the thirteen high test-scoring countries. Byron Wien was concerned that in the long run, test scores could undermine the intellectual leadership of the US. Three of our family’s college students, attending good universities, report that often the leaders in their various classes come from Asian homes. I hope many of them stay here and produce for this society. As a Trustee of Caltech, I am conscious of the number of brilliant students who come here on student visas and are forced by our immigration policies to return home with the extensive knowledge that they learned here.

I wonder whether we need to put a higher value on those companies that can attract the brightest on a global basis. The ability to get young brains may be of more value than the companies’ current cost of capital and resources.

The Next Decade : Where We’ve Been…And Where We’re Going

George Friedman has recently published his latest book with the above title. I have been privileged to see his author’s note. I can not wait to read the whole book. However, he is focusing on the tensions within the US between our global, if you will, empire roles versus the roles as a republic. In the drive to produce higher test scores and the creation of a “brainy” society, the simplest way to do it is by enforced discipline that eliminates alternative actions. The risk, according to Friedman, is that we unconsciously replicate ancient Rome or other rigid societies at the expense of the sound alternatives which are the basis of our own Republic.

Perhaps our portfolios should be balanced between the most efficient producers and those who practice creative destruction or alternatives to the present order. These are some of the critical issues that long term endowments and family fortunes need to examine and balance.

Maybe education does work

My youngest son sent me an email which stated, “On January 8th 1835, the national debt was $0.00 (the only time this has happened). Makes you think what would have happened if we kept that balance.” This is from a child of the inflationary 1960s. Maybe either education or age is finally kicking into focus the challenges that will face him and his children’s lives.

In conclusion

There is a lot more to think about in setting investment policy than near term interest rates and forthcoming earnings per share.

What do you think?

_____________________________________________
To Members of Mike Lipper's Blog Community:

For readers who would like to stay current on my uncommon perspectives regarding investing and world markets, join the community by subscribing, at no monetary cost, just your time and interest as well as occasional responses. Simply click the "To Receive Blog via Email" box on the left-side of the screen.

For those already receiving my blog by email, if you would like to recommend this blog to a relative, friend or colleague, the sign-up is located on the left-hand portion of the screen at www.MikeLipper.blogspot.com.