Introduction
For many mutual fund
investors owning domestic stock and bond funds, the first half of 2015 while
volatile on a week to week basis, for the six months performance was as
exciting as watching paint dry. For these investors the net result was minor
gains or losses in an essentially flat period. (We will discuss the positive
results for international investments below.)
Different
Speeds Create the Gap
Ever since the bottom
of the last economic cycle, the domestic stock and bond markets have been
producing worthwhile capital appreciation. The markets have been so much better
than the economy that a valuation gap may have been created. One can say that
some or the entire gap was formed by the combination with the Federal Reserve’s
manipulated-low interest policy that there were insufficient returns in savings
vehicles, thus money went into investing. At the very same time the main
vehicles for investing in stocks have been shrinking. The combination of
buy-backs and cash paid for mergers has reduced the number of shares available.
The net result is that we have had a shortage of satisfactory investment
vehicles. Shortages are cured by either new supply, higher prices, or both.
Valuations rose in the face of shortages of investments at reasonable prices in
spite of only pedestrian growth.
Closing
the Gap
Often when a valuation
gap appears it leads to a price correction. As noted by many, we have not had a domestic market correction which is
normally translated as a 10% drop since the 2009 bottom. There is a second way the gap can close, which
is that over time the earnings production grows within a flat price
environment. In addition to a sharp increase of new equity underwritings
including IPOs, supply is increasing. Thus the gap is structurally closing. Perhaps, flat is good for awhile.
Double
Digit International Returns
As this post is being
written the final performance returns for funds during the
first half are not yet available. Nevertheless, I do have fund performance data
through June 25th which shows a substantial number of International
funds producing double digit returns. The best returns were coming from China
and Japan. Undoubtedly some of the gains were given back since then,
particularly for domestic Chinese portfolios.
This phenomenon has
been understood by mutual fund investors who have been adding to their
non-domestic holdings practically every week this year while redeeming their
domestic stock funds. Is this just performance chasing? All too often this is a practice of
unsophisticated investors in a bull market which is often labeled momentum
investing. Only a few can execute a withdrawal from momentum investing
successfully.
Another
Possible Explanation
We have seen a similar
pattern in just about every mutual fund arena around the world. More and more
people globally have noticed that their governments and central banks are in
effect devaluing their local purchasing powers. While this pattern is global in
nature, for many investors it is wise to invest some of their wealth, perhaps
25-50% beyond their home countries, as a form of diversification. In the case
of US investors, there are some relatively bargain priced securities available
outside of the US. If this trend becomes too strong it could be another example
of the smart locals offloading their own securities onto the gullible
foreigners, so caution is urged.
Implications
of the Greek Vote
Now that the population
of Greece has voted “No,” there is an improved chance that the euro will last
longer than had the vote been reversed. There are increased odds that
agreements having to do with the level of deficits will be kept. Thus those
that remain within a smaller central currency will have a stronger currency to
deal with the dollar and yuan.
The
Meaning of Fund Redemptions
With every purchase of
mutual fund shares, redemption is set up. What is purchased must be sold
eventually to capture the full value of the investment. Historically
it is a mistake to view gross redemptions as a sign of dissatisfaction. Post-redemption surveys indicate that for the most part investors are cashing out of
various funds which have met their needs. Investors need the money for
retirement or other needs where aggressive investing may be unsuitable. Sometimes they switch to lower volatile funds to meet their new needs.
Most fund sales people
and many investors focus on relatively near‑term past performance. They do not
wish to buy into past poor performance, ignoring the principle of buying low
and selling high. Thus there is relatively little in the way of fund purchases
to meet normal, often actuarial based, redemptions. We are currently seeing
this pattern increasing in importance due to changes in market structures,
particularly by relatively inexperienced investors.
Unprofitable
Investors’ Mechanistic Solutions
Frequently it has been
said that mutual funds and some other investments are not bought, but are sold.
The reason behind this statement is that investing is complex and difficult to
do well. Earlier I alluded to momentum investing which is essentially jumping
on a speeding train. The basic view is that gains of yesterday will be repeated
tomorrow ad infinitum. If this always works, almost any upward sloping
mechanical strategy would work. Many are available through the wonders of the Internet
world.
Increasingly, fees and
commissions for investment products and services are controlled by regulatory
bodies. In their minds, by definition, lower fees are better than higher fees
without regard to quality of service and lifetime support. This view has led to
little to no upfront charges and various ingenious ways to generate other
revenues for the distribution and management entities. Thus, the number of full
time mutual fund salespeople making a living providing services to investors
has declined. Some of their efforts have been redirected to other packaged
products, including unregistered offerings. Thus, with the number of peddlers
down, the sales of open-end funds is not what it used to be.
There
is some Help
Today’s younger
investors are not facing their investment future alone. Many of them are employees of companies,
government bodies, schools and universities that offer salary reduction
programs to supplement or replace defined benefit pension plans. As an investment
advisor to some of these, where appropriate, I created a series of portfolios
of funds. When I began with these I was concerned that the employees
would pick out one of the better performing funds in the mix for their own
after-tax account. To counteract such an undiversified approach, I captioned our
reports with a cautionary label that individual funds used in the plans were not
necessarily a good personal investment, or similar words.
Even though one of the plans that we were the advisor to was judged to be the best large 401(k) plan for the past two years in a row, I saw no large scale use of the particular funds in the plan in the personal accounts, except by some of the people administering the plan. Evidently the high income participants separated their retirement money from their personal, and I presume more aggressive money. Thus in this case they did achieve reasonable diversification which should help them in the long run. In industry statistics the 401(k) and similar plans are considered institutions because of how they are sold, serviced, and priced, even though their ultimate beneficiaries are individual people who, over time, would have their own redemption patterns.
Even though one of the plans that we were the advisor to was judged to be the best large 401(k) plan for the past two years in a row, I saw no large scale use of the particular funds in the plan in the personal accounts, except by some of the people administering the plan. Evidently the high income participants separated their retirement money from their personal, and I presume more aggressive money. Thus in this case they did achieve reasonable diversification which should help them in the long run. In industry statistics the 401(k) and similar plans are considered institutions because of how they are sold, serviced, and priced, even though their ultimate beneficiaries are individual people who, over time, would have their own redemption patterns.
Question
of the Week:
When you close out an investment, do
you enter a similar investment or readjust your portfolio with the proceeds?
__________
Did
you miss my blog last week? Click
here to read.
Did someone forward you this Blog? To
receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS
feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com
Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A.
Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment