Introduction
“The world is too much
with us” is the title and first line of a famous sonnet by William Wordsworth. One of the truisms of the media world since
the first regular competitive publication is that bad news sells. If one scans
the front pages of daily papers as far back as possible, one may see that bad news gets a bigger play than good news and normal
news is relegated to the less important sections. Now that we live in a social
media/electronic world look at all the bad news that we are bombarded with
everyday. Also notice that the world, the country, most businesses and
individuals have not come to an end.
While a few can make
some money with short-term trading approaches, most who attempt to do it on a
day in/day out basis contribute to the wealth of various agents until their
capital or personality is exhausted. When Bernie Baruch was testifying before the
US Congress about the trading that preceded “The Market Crash,” members of the committee
were eagerly waiting to pounce on anyone who made money in the market. They
were pleased when he announced to them that he was a speculator. Then they were
downhearted when he explained the Latin derivation of the word meant to see far
ahead. (As I have observed in the past, subsequent to the hearings he chatted
with my grandfather on a familiar park bench and also counseled various US
Presidents.)
Using
the passage of time
Taking a leaf from
Speculator Mr. Baruch, I worry about the current conditions, but try to focus
on the long-term. One way I do this is with the development of the four Timespan
Portfolios* that I am developing for clients.
The first or Operational Portfolio is very much currently-oriented, with the
need to pay for the next two years of expenses to meet the crucial needs of the
account. Any unexpected shortfall will starve some important need.
Nevertheless, over a reasonably short period of time the operational capital
will be all consumed. To meet the continuing needs of the account it must be
replaced. That is the function of the Replenishment Portfolio which over the
next five years must replace the Operational Portfolio. While there is nothing
magic in five years it does represent a political period from leadership
elections, the minimum expected presidency of corporate CEOs, some turnover of
critical middle management and certain voting blocks. Some may prefer the four
year US presidential cycle up to a Biblical 7 year period.
In any case, based on past history one should expect a market decline during this period of about 25%. (If one does not see it in that period, be particularly weary because a bigger decline is likely.) During this timespan the markets are likely to be somewhat balanced between cyclical and secular trends with each playing a predominant role for part of the time. During this phase price-disciplined value buyers as well as those market players seeing expanding growth have a place in these portfolios.
*
Timespan
L PortfoliosTM
In any case, based on past history one should expect a market decline during this period of about 25%. (If one does not see it in that period, be particularly weary because a bigger decline is likely.) During this timespan the markets are likely to be somewhat balanced between cyclical and secular trends with each playing a predominant role for part of the time. During this phase price-disciplined value buyers as well as those market players seeing expanding growth have a place in these portfolios.
Personal
and institutional endowments
Even my friends who
feel that they are already ancient are likely to need to use a part of the
Endowment Portfolio which should have a focus between five and fifteen years. These
portfolios ought to be largely invested in reasonably consistent growers of
sales, operating earnings and dividends. This period is long enough to recover
from periodic declines. Rarely there is an equity portfolio that has produced a
negative result over fifteen years.
The
Legacy Portfolio
The final Timespan Portfolio
is the Legacy Portfolio which should be loaded with lots of emerging growth
opportunities, recognizing that a number of these will fail as businesses but
the survivors will more than make up for the failures. The focus of this
portfolio is beyond the current horizon and will be largely dictated as to how
technology acts on our world. Thus smart users of technology as well as their producers
should be important investments in this prudent portfolio.
Worries
If I am primarily
focused on the long-term in selecting investments for the Endowment and Legacy
type investors, I cannot avoid occasional short-term losses caused by relative
changes of marketplace popularity. What
I worry about is too much enthusiasm in an up market. This is not a major
concern today in the equity market. Excess enthusiasm however is very prevalent
in the fixed income market. The owners of various fixed income instruments have
convinced themselves that they know the future levels of interest rates and how
they will evolve. This certainty is a worry.
A major decline occurs
when there is a sudden shift in sentiment. One of the very reasons some fixed income
investors have done very well is that the dealing community has shrunk. With
fewer well-capitalized dealers, price trends become exaggerated beyond their
appropriate value levels. This has helped on the upside and will hurt
materially when the eventual decline hits fixed income.
My first worry is equity
market capital will be drawn into the fixed income market to replace the
missing levels of liquidity, the withdrawal of capital from the equity market
could trigger a stock market sell-off of significant dimensions.
My second worry is in
stock markets that are experiencing higher than currently customary volatility. We are seeing the 2015 leadership shift to more growth companies, particularly
of smaller market capitalization. Biotech funds are producing year to date performance
twice to three times Growth Stock funds and this is a global trend. Part of
this excitement is due to very highly valued acquisitions. A number of these stocks are gyrating well
above many consumer and industrial stocks that are suffering from mixed to
mediocre sales and limited opportunities for margin improvement. I can not
guess how high this move will be, but I remember from years ago that I used to
track funds that were up more than 100%. As a matter of fact I had to explain to a
board of directors that the poorest performing Tech fund was doing a good job
being only up 100% with others producing almost double those returns.
My real focus is to
avoid big declines that are likely to come from very extended stock market
prices. I am not sure about that likelihood for fixed income prices.
Question
of the week:
What are you worried about long-term?
__________
Did you miss my blog
last week? Click
here
to read.What are you worried about long-term?
__________
Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com .
Did someone forward you this Blog? To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog
each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left
column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com
Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment