Introduction
For
most dollar oriented investors 2014 was an "okay" year with a third
year in a row of double digit gains for the S&P 500, but not for the bulk
of institutional accounts. Consciously or not, many investors and managers were
aware of the length of the present bull market having entered its 61st month.
This has created twin dilemmas for the prudent management of responsible money.
First dilemma - Large Cap over-ownership
As
regular readers of these posts recognize and true to my analytical history, I
tend to view investments through the lens of mutual funds. When simplifying the
fund performance data for 2014 by size of market capitalizations the following
is revealed:
Large Cap funds
|
11%
|
Multi-cap funds
(Unrestricted/ or “go anywhere” funds
|
9%
|
Mid Cap funds
|
8%
|
Small Cap funds
|
3%
|
In a dynamic economy
the rank order of operating earnings power generation would be in the opposite
order, being led by Small Caps or possibly the successful "Go
Anywhere" funds. Focusing on operational earnings, excluding foreign
exchange benefits, I believe that the Large Caps were producing approximately 3
times the long-term growth of the Small Caps. The better market performance of
the Large Caps, I believe, was a function of market structure changes. Some
institutional investors being concerned with the duration of this bull market moved heavily into Large Cap stocks directly or more importantly through the use of ETFs invested in the
S&P 500 and other indices. Because of perceived greater liquidity in Large Caps they were hiding out in what we used to call warehouses. With governments
all over the world looking to Large Caps being "social progress"
engines, I have some doubts as to the growth prospects for Large Cap companies.
Second dilemma - Historical constraints
As is often the case,
apparent boundaries come with both hard data and locked-in thought processes.
The data is the easy part. While as noted we are in the
sixty-first month of the recovery, of the nine last market recoveries, four
have been over 100 days in length with the longest being 181 days. Thus for a manager a possible career risk is exiting
too soon which puts a premium on investing in liquid positions. Because so many
others have made similar judgments as to the better liquidity in Large Caps, if
there is a sudden drop in the market, I believe the excessive amount invested
in Large Caps will find their exit liquidity either expensive or non-existent for
those that are late.
The biggest risk for investors and their
managers are the biases that many of us labor with in making so-called rational
decisions. The following are a list of these biases as listed by Essential
Analytics:
List
of biases
Outcome, herding, conviction (the curse of
knowledge), recency, framing, band wagon effect, information, anchoring,
optimism.
I suggest that many of
these biases find their way into reports; supporting in
effect, the reasons we all have made decisions that haven't worked out. The key
for all of us is to understand our biases. Some biases we will be able to
overcome. Others we will have to accept as immutable.
This
suggests that when putting together a portfolio of funds or managers, it would
be wise to try to diversify the various biases of the hired portfolio managers
as well as our own as the owners or fiduciaries of the capital being deployed.
Overcoming biases
I have
a definite advantage in this task by personality. By nature I am both curious
of what I don't know and often a contrarian. As a contrarian again using the
mutual fund microscope, the following may be useful thoughts:
Looking to extremes one
might wish to set up a pair trade of being long some of the components in the S&P Latin American energy index which
declined -39% vs. the average Indian fund which was up 41% in 2014. In a
similar fashion one might start to research funds in the following groups that
declined in 2014:
Energy Commodity funds
|
-34%
|
General Commodity funds
|
-16%
|
Global Natural Resources funds
|
-15%
|
Domestic Natural Resources funds
|
-15%
|
Dedicated Short-bias funds
|
-15%
|
I take
some comfort in the contrarian thoughts contained in the headline to John
Authers insightful Financial
Times column: "The case for gently shifting money away from
US." I believe a well-reasoned portfolio should be looking for
opportunities on a global basis both in terms of what companies do and where
various securities are traded.
Final
thought
Many
year-end predictions are essentially extrapolations of existing market trends
and this could be what will happen. However, I am searching for the beginnings
of new trends that will produce +20% or -20% in a twelve month period. I would
appreciate hearing your thoughts as to when and which direction (or both) you
expect price movement. I firmly believe we will once again experience this kind
of action.
__________
Did
someone forward you this Blog? To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday,
please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com
Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment