Many of us are familiar
with the song that begins “Money makes the world go round.” As a card carrying CFA®
charterholder and a recovering numbers cruncher, I will warrant that is how all
too many measure the rotations of an individual’s, a business’s or a nation’s rise
and fall through periods of net accumulations and net spending. However,
strange for a numbers addict to say, I believe it is an incomplete and in many
ways a faulty measure, particularly when considering investments.
Money=Currency
Money is an instrument
of exchange used in buying and selling. In the modern world, money is expressed
in terms of different currencies that can be transmitted physically over a
sales counter or electronically through a banking system. As these exchanges
are most often impersonal and rapid, we use numerical shorthand to represent
the terms of exchange.
Money
buys goods, services, and the time of others + what?
When we make purchases
of physical goods most of us think in terms of the item; e.g., an auto or
laptop. We do not consciously think of the hours and talents that went into
producing it. We are somewhat more conscious of the hours and the credentialed
talents when we purchase services from doctors, lawyers, accountants and
perhaps paid speakers. We need to include into that list paid workers such as
plumbers, electricians, and landscapers. One can easily put an immediate
numerical value on a number of goods and services, particularly if there are
competitors. However, most of what we buy today is not only for immediate
consumption. Thus, there is an implied belief that the buyer is purchasing the
goodwill of the vendor, but not in an accounting sense. The value of this
goodwill is not just after warranties but entails the quality and quantity of
thinking and effort that can make us better users of our purchases. The advertising
industry has taught us that various purchases have an emotional benefit, like
making us feel good about ourselves. This combination of goodwill purchased and
the benefit of us feeling better are difficult to measure and can in the long-run
be more important to us than initial price paid. I would suggest that these
considerations make the valuation of cash more difficult than a bookkeeping
exercise.
Cash/currency
in your investment portfolio
I have just completed a
couple days of visiting Portfolio Managers of different funds in accounts that
we manage for both institutional and wealthy individual investors. In some
respects the most revealing parts of these discussions were about the smallest
part of their portfolios, the cash on their balance sheets. The different
comments are as follows:
- “Cash is a residual after I make all the investments that should be made.”
- “Cash is awaiting a few more investments that are out of price range or are not fully identified or more analytical work is needed.”
- “Cash is a way to express a view as to the level of the market.”
- “Cash is flow management device.”
- “Foreign cash is a hedge against home currency.”
- “Cash is awaiting a planned sizeable redemption.”
- “Substantial cash holdings allow for riskier other holdings.”
I am sure as I talk
with other portfolio managers I will learn of other points of view.
How
do I use cash?
As indicated in earlier
posts, I view my portfolio construction skills as more of an artist than a
mechanical contractor. Carrying the analogy further I hope to be building
estates, academic facilities, research labs, performance venues, medical
facilities among other worthwhile activities. As each account is managed to
meet different needs, my use of cash is far from uniform. The rhythm and timing
of the account as well as the feelings about money are taken into
consideration.
I use cash in a similar
fashion as those that are listed above. Additionally, in risk adverse smaller balanced
accounts I have used Treasury money market funds to avoid any principal loss.
Currently, I am reducing this element in favor of ultra-short (duration) government
funds and some short-term TIPS. My general attitude is that my clients should
take their risk in the large equity portions of their portfolios not in fixed income.
If
cash is trash as bulls believe, try ETFs
If I am a portfolio
construction artist, the ultimate mechanically constructed investment product is
the Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). One of the many reasons I believe actively
managed portfolios should be compared only with other actively managed
portfolios doing the same thing is as seen from the discussion above; i.e.,
active managers have varying amounts of cash in their portfolios. ETFs are
designed to replicate the performance of a fixed list of securities. The list
does not include any cash. Thus in a rising market all of the securities within
an ETF portfolio could be rising in price. In an actively managed portfolio
only the actively traded securities have the opportunity to rise (and fall),
the cash is only a very small amount of income. Thus there is a tactical
advantage in favor of ETFs. My clients believe that well-chosen selected
investments will produce better strategic results.
What
does your use of cash say about you?
Please share with me privately
or publicly.
----------------------------------------
Did you miss Mike Lipper’s Blog last
week? Click here to read. Did someone forward you this Blog? To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com .
Copyright © 2008 - 2013 A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment