In many periods value focused mutual funds and similar managers perform better than growth oriented managers. When growth managers perform well they can perform very well and in some cases produce doubles without leverage. Value oriented managers in good times don’t do as well. However the secret to their better performance in many periods is that they do not fall as much as the portfolios of growth managers. The smaller declines are not only due to the fact that their stocks don’t rise as much as the growth stocks, but often because of the value managers’ price valuation discipline, they cannot find qualifying securities to buy. Thus, they somewhat involuntarily start to build up their cash positions, particularly if some of their holdings are subject to cash acquisitions. In reviewing a number of fund portfolios as part of my investment practice, I am beginning to notice a rise in the cash and short-term holdings of respected value managers. As these managers do not claim any market timing expertise, in the past the buildup of cash could have been premature to a top of the general market. Now I believe we are seeing early stages of this phenomenon. If this is not a top, market participants will have to see rising expectations.
Fair to full value
From my prior posts one can see that I believe that the large value positions in my financial services portfolio have recovered substantially from their 2008 low points, and perhaps are selling over their fair value levels. A portion of my portfolio is invested for the long-term in good companies. My unwillingness to currently buy more of these good companies would suggest that I have backed into a portion of my portfolio that is currently fully priced. I believe other value focused managers have reached similar views in their broader portfolios. In my case I have not been using current earnings, but my subjective belief in the earnings power of these companies contingent upon a “normal” business and financial expansion. My valuations have been inordinately helped by the currently manipulated interest rates in the marketplace. The math behind the valuation process is to determine a reasonable estimate of future earnings power from existing businesses and then to discount the resultant future stock prices using a somewhat cyclical price/earnings ratio. I use the current level of interest rates to discount this future valuation back to a present price comparison. For high quality companies, historically I have used the yield on 10-Year US Treasuries, now below 2%. For lesser quality investments I have used the yield on similar maturity High Yield (“junk bonds”) currently below 7%. The lower the yield the smaller the discounts applied. In the past these yields have been 5 percentage points higher, 7 and 12% respectively. Therefore my valuations are susceptible to market forces.
The value investor uses the current price as representative of perceived value by the market and compares that to his/her perceptions of value, particularly to a what a strategic buyer or a liquidator would pay. The growth buyer perceives what a security would be worth in the future. The future price is based on a series of interrelated expectations. These expectations include broad factors encompassing demographic and psychographic trends, political realities, economics, relative military powers and the willingness to use them. Also included in the list of expectations by smart analysts and smarter investors in dealing with a specific company are its revenues, operating margins, net free cash flow, debt service, market share, new product development and likely competitive responses.
Professional portfolio managers’ expectations should include expected changes in the current shareholder population and their motivations.
Whether we recognize it or not, the play of expectations is at work in the marketplace every trading day. During the “risk on/risk off” phase for the last couple of years, a narrowing fraternity of traders dominated the marketplace. While traders are still important, a renewed group is coming off the sidelines. These are institutional and individual investors who are being forced to remedy the shortfall in the purchasing power of their capital to meet their long-term needs; i.e., retirement and building/rebuilding long-term facilities. For the most part these investors did not leave the investment arena. They either let their cash build up, chased yields into fixed income securities, and/or invested in alternatives in private equity, real estate and some commodity plays including a little bit in gold or gold mining shares. I believe we are in the process of seeing a change of comrades in arms as to the investor army that is taking the lead for market leadership. Recently stock markets around the world have been rising. Many of the trading fraternity, (including aggressively managed hedge funds) have long positions in gold or related securities and their short book has been growing. Some believe the rapid rise in the VIX Index over the last week was somewhat due to panic buying by hedge funds to cover their short positions in response to this supposed indicator of bearish sentiment. The rise in the stock markets coming during a period of extreme negative views toward many elected politicians is being led, I believe, by longer-term investors. If I am correct, the impetus to commit money now into common stocks is based on growing changes in expectations.
In general, I believe that buyers of stocks these days believe some of the following:
1. The private sectors of the economy are showing gradual signs of global expansion. Materially higher stock prices are dependent of revenue growth.
2. The public sector is shrinking its employment base and to some extent its overall compensation load on taxpayers. In an ironic way, this could be good for both the surviving government workers and the public they serve. One of the reasons the private sector is in better shape than the public sector is that business has raised operating margins to high, if not record levels, by significantly improving labor and capital productivity. (Doing things better with fewer people.) Until very recently many federal and some state and municipal governments have not faced these challenges. Traditionally the way governments in control have addressed problems, the same way the North did early in the American Civil War, was to throw enormous amounts of people and money at the perceived crisis of the moment. Over time this technique is self-defeating; as those with more limited resources come up with productive solutions.
To comprehend the growth in the US federal government’s direct and contracting payroll, drive as we did this weekend through Northern Virginia and Maryland on the run up to Baltimore and observe the enormous real estate developments that are full of employees and their families dependent on US taxpayers. Smarter and further automation is likely to improve the delivery system of necessary government services. In field after field society has found that externalizing various government services has produced better results, particularly when there is no union involvement. The non-profit world is going through similar problems. As they become more market disciplined their audiences will benefit from more efficient delivery of their vital services
3. The unstoppable march of demographics is producing several cohorts of capable people who want to work. At the one end is a better schooled, (notice I did not say educated) population. These individuals are eager to earn and for the most part eager to learn commercially viable skills. I believe the expectation is that these willing workers will be absorbed into the work force both here within the US as well as in many other countries. High-speed computer communications have made locations less sensitive to success than specific expertise, including customer service. At the other end of the age spectrum, we and many other “developed” countries have a growing segment of seniors who want to work for income or socialization. They have useful skills and in many cases seniors are the fastest growing learners of new computer techniques. These two leagues, the young and the seniors, represent to me and my Marine Corps training, a large reserve element than can support and supplement those who are more advanced, but at lower net wages.
4. Technology and particularly medical/health technology is producing a potential population that can be productive in every sense of the word. Many of these improvements will actually lower the cost to society which can have dramatic impact on the growing gap of retirement funding that is a global phenomenon. All of this represents investment opportunities.
5. Because of European colonization efforts we currently live in a world where the Northern Hemisphere is economically and financially more advanced, with a number of exceptions. Identifying three of the exceptions demonstrates what can happen in the Southern Hemisphere; Australia*, Chile*, and South Africa. I expect over time that money and talent from the North will leverage the local talent and other resources in the South to create a long-term investment boom.
*I have investments in these markets through single country funds.
Changes in levels of expectations are normal in the attitudes towards the stock market. One can gauge where we are in terms of the distance from a speculative top by looking at the period that the bulls are using in their purchase recommendations. While quarterly numbers are taken as verification of longer-term trends, they are having less impact now. Currently the focus is more on the second half of this year which leads to the full year results which for the most part are used for valuations. We are entering the time of the year when professional analysts will start to publish their next year’s estimates. Recent visits to sound buy-side shops focused on the detail in their five year estimates. As part of my responsibilities for a non-profit I was asked to come up with a ten year estimate of endowment performance to test the ability to meet spending needs. I am also in the process of working with my accountant to come up with the ranges of expected performance to be contemplated for a dynasty trust. Thus I am already dealing with different time period expectations, but so is the market. The price of Apple at over $700 in September, 2012 was largely based on a long-term projection of the continued growth of their recently introduced iPhone 5, with particular focus on the perceived potential in China. For lots of reasons that I will be happy to discuss privately, these expectations were wrong or at least way too premature. The current price of 430.17 displays the risk in rising expectations. As the stock with the largest market capitalization, it is note-worthy that the fall in the price did not lead to a general market sell off (which has happened previously when the leader’s price balloon was popped) and may signify that market participants do not currently expect a market decline.
Please share with me, perhaps privately, what are your expectations for your money in the period you are most focused?
Did you miss Mike Lipper’s Blog last week? Click here to read.
Did someone forward you this Blog? To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com.
Copyright © 2008 - 2013 A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.