Sunday, September 28, 2025

Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 


The Art of Successful Investments

The primary reason prices move is a difference of opinion, otherwise they would stay frozen at a given level. There are two causes for the move, information changes and different investment timelines. Two approaches cause changes – a shift in prices and a shift in thought process. Most daily price changes are reactions to other price changes, which causes “outer directed” flows in the trading market. The so-called “smart money” is buying. Less often, prices move due to recognition that the future will be meaningfully different than the present. Using military terms for these changes, we would refer to them as tactical and strategic, or in psychological terms outer or inner directed. As a practical matter, outer directed frequently changes direction as markets ebb and flow. In effect, they are trading.

 

In contrast to trading, inner-directed investors move when they perceive the future to be significantly different than the present, or possibly the past. They are not primarily driven by prices, but by changes recognizing a fundamental future change. I label this approach strategic investing.

 

Traders can make changes intraday or at other frequencies. Their focus is the ratio of winning versus losing. They enjoy being with the crowd.

Strategic investors on the other hand may have years or decades between actions. A strategic investor is often lonely, in that few if any see what he/she sees. The lack of a crowd, however, reduces the size of any losses. Their loss is missing another opportunity. 

 

The media and many pundits live on providing tactical information for trading, paying relatively little attention to strategic investments. The reaction to recent press commentary provides a strategic clue of the wider significance shown in parenthesis:

 

“Amazon plans to shut fresh grocery chain in United Kingdom after just four years” (Both Walmart and CVS have reached similar conclusions. In the case of Walmart, fresh groceries appear to be a critical loss leader to get customers for other products. CVS is trying to reconfigure their “drug stores” to have a smaller front, concentrating on drug and clinical services. I suspect there is an import pricing problem which will be addressed successfully somehow.)

 

“BMO is considering selling six branches” and “Citigroup to sell an interest in Banamex”. (Both Bank of Montreal and Citi recognize the old model of local branches being the center of a local community’s financial business. However, much of that exposure can be handled by phone or computer services, or an increase by non-bank entities. Banks are laboring under various restrictions where restraints are less likely to produce troublesome losses.)

 

“American biggest corporations keep talking about AI, but struggle to explain the upside” (I have yet to see a published estimate of new sales or profits generated. One clue to the problem is several AI providers taking all three CFA exams, with the best machines scoring 79.1% correct answers. Considering AI requires a previously printed available source, one wonders about the machine’s ability to think creatively in answering a question. Maybe the test creators were not as knowledgeable as they should have been. Furthermore, I know many CFAs who I would not hire to manage money for me today.)

 

“Poland restores China overland trade route.” (The article did not mention the rail link tying traffic from China through the mid-continent, including the now independent former Russian states. These states include Kazakhstan with possibly world’s largest deposit of Uranium and substantial amounts of oil. The rail link was closed to put pressure on Russia. When reopened, rail traffic can travel throughout central Europe and into Spain etc. We are in an era of expanding rail service in every continent. The recently announced merger of Norfolk & Western with Union Pacific creates the first transcontinental freight line. (The question on many investors’ minds is why Burlington Northern, owned by Berkshire Hathaway*, has not entered into merger negations with C&S to create a parallel transcontinental line. My thought is there might be potential difficulty with labor negations. On Burlington’s mile-long freight trains there are only two employees, an engineer and a conductor. There have been difficult contracts negotiations with the conductors. In addition, there have been similar problems with Berkshire’s airplane pilots in their private rental flight business. We were in London when their subway system went on strike for 5 days. In addition, New Jersey Transit is facing a rail strike. In both cases the employees received good wages for 38 hours or less of work.)

*Owned in managed and personal accounts.

 

Short-term Signals

  • The University of Michigan consumer confidence sentiment survey for August dropped to 55.1% vs 58.2% the month before.
  • In the latest trading week, the number of declining stocks was greater than the number rising.

 

Longer-term Worries

Readers will not be surprised to hear that I believe there is a lot of wisdom harbored within the mutual fund industry. There is a group of funds that were designed to accumulate money for retirement and to manage capital to meet needs in retirement. These portfolios were typically comprised of stocks and bonds. The stocks were meant to supply growth and the bonds some protection against periodic declines.  These funds are labeled Mixed Asset Target, with a specific year indicating the probable retirement year. Interestingly, something happened on the way to retirement. None of the fund peer groups meant to meet retirement needs prior to 2050 produced average returns above 14.25% year-to-date.  This suggests to me that we should consider a range of twenty-five to forty years for long-term investments. This means we should hold investments for a long time and only sell if conditions change and are unlikely to return.

 

 

International equities had 10 better peer groups, world sector funds and regional funds had 6 each, sector equity, global equity, and mixed assets had 5 peer groups each for a total of 37 peer funds groups out of over 100 tracked. Turning to local stock indices, there were 67 countries better than the US for the same period.

 

It may not be too late to add international exposure to your holdings. This would exclude funds investing in US registered stocks, as you would still be exposed to US dollar purchasing power risk.

 

As of Thursday’s close, there were 18 mutual fund peer groups in the US Diversified Equity Funds Super group. The best performer on a year-to-date basis was Equity Leveraged Funds +29.25%, with twice the gain of the second-place leader Mid-Cap Growth Funds +14.25%. Since borrowed money (margin) is not used by most mutual funds, I am excluding equity leverage funds for the following analysis. Treating 14.25% as a good performer, I wanted to see which super group categories were better.

 

Dollar Risk

One reason people feel poorer today than a year ago, even though their stocks and homes are hopefully valued more than a year ago. You must go to the shopping center to understand the real economics. Almost all clothes, if their quality is maintained, sell at higher prices. Fancy cars, if they are sold at your mall, will also be higher. When you go to the grocery store or fresh food counter, meat and fish of the same quality are higher.

 

If you dig into the financial statements of many providers who raise money from overseas, their costs have risen since a year ago.

 

You may feel poorer now, but you will feel worse in the future. What caused this to happen? Who did this to you? Well, we all did it to ourselves. We collectively wanted too much from our government. They met our needs, but since we did not want to pay full price for what was provided, the politicians of both parties borrowed in our name, creating ever larger deficits financed with higher interest rates.

 

For the next ten years I expect to double the money I pay to the government for income taxes, sales taxes, use charges, tariffs, and probably transportation costs.

 

What are your thoughts?



 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, September 21, 2025

Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 


 

Since last December the bulls have been calling for a drop in the Fed interest rate. Some anticipated an interim pay-off near the close on Thursday when the last print on the 10-year yield failed to maintain its announcement high, fulfilling the dictum of selling on the news. The number of Friday’s declines on both the NYSE and NASDAQ were above the number of rising prices.

 

With the much-expected rate cut I found it interesting that the sample surveys of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) were bearish for the last three weeks. The six-month projections stayed in the 40% range for all three weeks (42.4%, 49.5%, and 43.4% respectively). In the latest week, which probably did not benefit from Thursday’s rate cut, the bullish estimate of 41.7% was slightly below the bearish call.

 

The explanation for the three main market indices rising to record levels from their April lows this week was the familiar “FOMO”, fear of missing out. I suspect traders sharing that impulse were largely housed in retail-oriented wealth management arms of brokerage firms and non-trust departments of banks.

 

The battle for investment survival is being waged by armies marching under the “FOMO” banner, as well as others withholding their purchase orders upon reading the economic data. There are two ammunition arsenals safeguarding the non-buyers, the declining number of job-openings and the rise of non-US traded equities benefiting from the fall of the US dollar. In April there were 158,000 jobs added, which fell to 22,000 in August. Barron’s shows the investment performance of 14 local markets in Europe and Asia each week. This week Europe had 4 risers and Asia 8. Asian and Emerging Market funds were most prominent among the better performing mutual funds this week.

 

On a longer-term basis there are a number of worries about investing in US markets:

  1. The US market is becoming more speculative, with year-over-year NYSE share volume rising 16.24% and NASDAQ 68.97%.
  2.  The current administration appears to want to reduce the independence of the Federal Reserve.
  3. The President and SEC are floating the idea of switching from quarterly reporting to semiannual. Both ideas will make foreign-traded issues more attractive than they are now.
  4. The drive to include non-publicly traded securities in retail accounts, particularly retirement portfolios, is expected to increase the risk of losses.
  5. The London edition of the Financial Times devoted a full page to the headline “A new era of McCarthyism?”, showing a picture of President Trump and the late Senator McCarthy. This reminds me of sibling rivalry between an older brother and a successful younger brother. With a number of listed London exchange stocks moving to the US there is risk to a portion of the London market.

  

With the US stock market indices but not the average shares at record levels and the economy open to question, please be careful.



 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper's Blog: Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, September 14, 2025

Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Selected and Casual Road Notes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 


In London on a visit with Mount Vernon Ladies Association.

  1. PNC buying a Colorado Bank signifies that it needs more assets than it can reasonably produce operationally.
  2. Long-term, the fixed income swing in wealth management accounts is bullish for equities.
  3. The value of information is more than its accuracy.
  4. Nitrate risk in Iowa and other states is a big problem for the farm community.
  5. In the UK, a cartoon referred to Andrew Jackson as King Andrew. He was the first of our four activists Presidents. The other three were Teddy Rosevelt, FDR, and now Trump. Each tried to materially change the financial structure of our society and fought with the courts, which may have hurt more than it helped.
  6. The British Empire was based more on global trade than military strength. With that as a thought, allow me to present a very controversial goal which will be very difficult to create. The US and China should form a common market as the two largest markets. Both countries have disciplined labor, science, and leadership based on corporate skills.
  7. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations was read by William Pitt, the younger. His leadership may have been a major contributor to British economic growth after 1776.
  8. Through Thursday, the year-to-date average performance of US Diversified Equity Funds was +12.70%. Only Large-Cap Diversified Growth funds did better. However, a large number of equity fund averages were better, mostly technology and overseas investments. Five fund peer groups produced rises of more than 30%: Global Precious Metals +98.46%, Latin America +36.75%, China +32.84%, International Value +31.69%, and International Multi Cap Value +30.94%.
  9. The AAII survey sample of six-month projections showed 28% being bullish and 49.5% bearish. These are close to extreme results.

 

Conclusion

Too much attention is paid to the short term, with media commentary often having a negative slant. There clearly are risks, with our current activist president paralleling the 1929-1932 period, where FDR accidently turned a recession into depression. Even so, the long-term for our descendants could be quite attractive, eventually.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper's Blog: Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission. 

Sunday, September 7, 2025

Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Bad Comparisons Can Lead

To Faulty Conclusions

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Your Portfolio vs. Stock Indices

The biggest trap the media and sales community set for both institutions and individual investors is comparing portfolio performance with a stock index constructed by a publisher. The best US stock market index is probably the S&P 500 Composite (SWX is its symbol).

 

The index is published by Standard & Poor’s Global (*), whose components are selected by data analyst editors, not investment managers. In a performance year where a company splits into two or more publicly traded stocks; the index carries each component of the former stock for the performance year. That is why the SWX measures slightly more than 500 stocks at times. Additionally, almost every active investor’s portfolio contains some cash or similar instrument. In periods of large gains or losses, the performance of non-equities will affect the performance of an account, but not the index. Furthermore, it is extremely rare for an active portfolio to own anywhere close to 500 names.

(*) Owned in client and personal accounts

 

In measuring the performance of the SWX, the measurement compares the closing trade price of the prior trade date to the ending price of the current day. It is extremely common for the ending price to be higher or lower than what an investor receives, so the actual performance of an active account is likely to be different than an end price calculation.

 

The management committee of the Wall Street Journal and the Standard & Poor’s editors have decided that SWX will only contain stocks that are listed on US stock exchanges. They also do not limit the percentage size of holdings in the composite, while the SEC limits diversified mutual funds to holding no more than 5% weighting within the portfolio of any given stock at cost (not market). Non-diversified funds are not restricted this way.

 

In today’s world, managed accounts are almost certain to hold cash or fixed income instruments as redemption reserves. Additionally, opportunity reserves will in many cases include non-US listed securities.

 

Many years ago, for these reasons, we convinced a number of outside directors of mutual funds to compare the performance of their funds to similar portfolios of funds. I believe this is the way almost all investment accounts should be measured, whether they are funds or not.

 

Other Mis-labeling

Last week, three of the five leading large-cap stocks were labeled financials; JP Morgan Chase (*), Morgan Stanley(*), and American Express(*). None of the articles I read mentioned that Charles Schwab(*) was the fourth largest declining large stock on Friday. Clearly, Schwab has something else going on that the first three do not, despite sharing the same industry label.

(*) Client or personally owned

 

Also last week, there was no mention of various countries whose local market indices showed gains, Europe 6 and Asia 12.

 

Another example of incomplete labeling was a headline of Goldman predicting that “Gold will hit close to $5000, if Trump undermines the Fed”. Perhaps true, but other commodities and some foreign stocks may do just as well. (Coincidently, a strategic collaboration between Goldman and T. Rowe Price to create a range of public and private investments was also announced. As a part of this collaboration, Goldman will invest $1 billion in open market purchases of T. Rowe Price stock.  Perhaps the more important message, is that Goldman believes the market is not offing enough diversity.)

 

Question: What are your thoughts? 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.