Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings
Beware of Cheap, Seek Fair Slowly
Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –
Current Conditions
This coming week we will
get the Federal Reserve’s view of the appropriate level of interest rates. Much
of the focus will be on the interest rate number. Far less attention paid to
the cause of the action. Without understanding the causes, it is difficult to
comprehend whether the resultant rates and other measures are going to have the
desired result.
Not discussed is what I
am labeling the “Politicians’ Put”. Where politicians avoid responsibility for
causing harm to people’s income, jobs, and capital by making the Fed and Administrative
State Commissioners responsible. There is precious little evidence that the Fed
and various commissioners have any skills at predicting the future or recommending
wise actions.
Part of the fallacy in
relying on these individuals is that they tend to depend on numbers
questionably put together. Too little attention is paid to the weekly local
Reserve Bank presidents’ lunches with businesspeople and consumers. Some
Presidents are better at asking follow-up questions than others.
I have seen the coming of
the recession since last autumn. My source of information was walking various
malls, talking with competent people unable to find jobs, and employers failing
to find applicants possessing the right attitudes. In many cases, the supply
shortages were due to a lack of front-line labor and supervisors.
The following data is
mixed in terms of future implications:
· An
inverted yield curve with the ten-year rate at 2.78% vs the two-year rate of 2.99%
· The
JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index falling -9.5% vs last year
· The
Labor Force Participation Rate falling -5% vs 2000
Start Buying?
The sign a bottom price has
been reached is often a surge in transaction volume, signifying massive
capitulation. “While everyone is talking bearish, no one selling is being heard”.
Stock transaction volume is mild, although bond transaction volume may signify
capitulation.
In the weekend Wall
Street Journal (WSJ) there is a headline titled “Business Activity Declined
Sharply”. In addition, showing the US and Global purchasing managers index
dropping to 47.5 from the prior week’s 52.3, clearly showing a contraction.
After a significant decline
there is a burning question in the heart of every investor about when one should
begin buying stocks? The question pivots not on timing, but price.
I have had the extreme
pleasure and honor of knowing great investors over 60 years. The first is Charlie
Munger, who taught Warren Buffett that it is better to buy a great company at a
fair price than a good company at a cheap price. His belief is that a great
company gets better over time, whereas a cheap price only goes up for a period.
Before John Neff created
a great record with Windsor and Gemini funds. He worked at a midwestern bank
where they evaluated corporate loan applicants based on their average earnings
power over five years. He applied this process to stock selection at Wellington
Management for Vanguard funds, which helped his winning funds during bear
markets.
One must be very careful
applying the lessons of these two investor giants today. Some pundits are currently
recommending so-called fallen angels. These are good or possibly great
companies currently trading at depressed or “cheap” valuations. Current prices compared
to last year’s earnings, or the last period of rising earnings is not
particularly relevant. Particularly if we are in a recession that extends
beyond a year. It is quite possible with future depressed earnings and today’s
prices some stocks may be selling at record high valuations.
Depressed Earnings
There are two main causes for depressed earnings.
- A fall in demand for their products or services. As demand is a function of people’s attitudes, demand tends to fluctuate fast and cyclically.
- Companies investing substantial resources in future products and services will materially leverage current sales and earnings if successful.
I am following a few financial services companies in the second group. Their earnings are being penalized substantially more than their peers who have only cyclically depressed results in this downturn. My job as an analyst/investor is to attempt to select a company becoming a greater company, by accepting a bigger stock price decline than peers. This approach could lead to a different roster of candidates than held presently.
To some degree the
relative size of a price decline is related to the nature of their shareholder
base. That is why I tend to favor institutional quality companies, where a substantial
portion of shares are owned by those relying on their own experienced internal
analysts.
Question: Have you changed your way
of selecting securities due to the changing structure of the market.
Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/time-to-be-contrary-weekly-blog-741.html
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/switching-prime-focus-weekly-blog-739.html
Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please
subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com
Copyright © 2008 - 2022
A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment