Perspectives: Risk, Liquidity, Duration, + Concentration - Weekly Blog # 690

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Perspectives: Risk, Liquidity, Duration, + Concentration

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Risk

Risk is the penalty for being wrong resulting from the loss of financial capital, time spent and the opportunity to improve returns. I believe it is impossible to avoid all risks. I attempt to identify as many risks as possible and manage these risks by addressing them. All assets have imbedded risks, whether we can identify them or not. As I invest internationally and assume some of my perceived obligations will outlive me, I make provisions for addressing these issues with what I leave. These perspectives color my investment thinking.

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to buy or sell any asset at any given time. One can easily rank the salability of any asset, from cash in home currencies to the sale of heavily-indebted unique real estate. For the small securities investor size is not normally a problem, as long as practices and regulations don’t change. However, for the very large investor liquidity can be a hurdle that delays action. It can be costly or in rare cases prohibited. While this is not the case for the average investor, the liquidity price for a large investor can temporarily impact the price for all investors. Take the mandatory quick sale of large assets. They could scare the other market participants into withdrawing from the market or participating only at a substantial discount. If all the gold in Fort Knox or all the assets of gigantic investor had to be sold in the next 24 hours, the price would not resemble the previous day’s price. While these are extreme and unlikely events, last week’s average performance of US diversified mutual funds shows the importance of size, as shown below:

Average Total Return Performance US Diversified Funds

For the week ended July 15, 2021

        Large-Cap    +0.74%

        Multi-Cap    +0.18%

        Mid-Cap      -0.31%

        Small-Cap    -0.68%

Thus, in one week the transaction value of small-caps fell 1.42% compared to large-caps. One might call the difference a liquidity preference or discount. Why does it exist? Many institutional investors prefer to invest in a relatively smaller number of large-cap stocks rather than investing in many more small-caps. Most passive funds are heavily invested in large-caps. Additionally, I suspect the shift from brokerage-commissioned retail accounts to wealth management discretionary-fee accounts have increased the use of large cap securities. 

This phenomenon is not inevitably bad for the small cap investor. Small cap stocks are more plentiful on the NASDAQ than on the “Big Board”. For some time I have suggested the NASDAQ is a savvier market, it went up the most and is currently declining the most of the three main stock indices. I often find more attractive investments in stocks having fewer institutional holders. These days institutions tend to move more like a heard than investments in less popular stocks.

Duration

Duration is a concept applied by bond investors focusing on the yield and maturity of bonds. I believe a somewhat similar concept should be used in selecting equities. A common analytical technique is to divide stocks into “growth” and “value”, leaving perhaps 1/3 of the universe with two horses in their stable. Over an extended period, this may produce a more satisfying and less volatile result. The key metric for “growth” companies is an expectation of growing faster than the economy. For value, the metric is expected share price movement. These two metrics are quite different, the only concept they should share is how long it takes to reach their goal. 

For “growth” stocks the critical question is, will future earnings justify today’s often over inflated price. Today there is a belief you are buying at a bargain price because future earnings will be so large. For example, if a stock is selling for 40 times current earnings, it could be conceived as selling at 10 times future earnings, if they are five to ten times current levels. This makes paying a high price today acceptable if future earnings are expected to deliver. The key to this assumption is the level of earnings and how long it takes to reach that required level. The second factor is a length of time or a duration.

The analysis supporting a “value” recommendation is far less patient. A stock represents value today if and when the market recognizes the value. Value recognition is most often caused by outside forces, such as economic growth, changes of input/output prices, market share changes, acceptance of new products and/or management. Sentiment can change much quicker than actual fundamentals. After long periods of lagging stock performance, a change in sentiment can bring dramatic price performance. Thus, the history of value stocks is that they can be volatile, producing sharp gains and quick declines once value is recognized. Therefore, in our mathematical analysis value stocks have a shorter duration. This is appropriate because a substantial portion of the gain is not internally generated compared to growth stocks.

Should one invest in growth or value? In examining eleven time periods the average growth fund did better than the average value fund eight out of eleven periods. (Please contact me if you want to see the details.) What is perhaps most significant is that since the trough on March 23, 2020, both growth and value funds gained 69%. This suggests to me that the bulk of a risk-aware long-term portfolio should be growth oriented, both domestic and international. Some well-chosen value driven funds should also be included, with particular emphasis on small and mid-cap funds.

Concentration

Examining the long-term performance of mutual funds and less-public portfolios, the better ones tend to be more concentrated. This is easy to understand, the wining positions get bigger and the losers get smaller or disappear. A classic example is one $75 billion growth fund. It has 46.9% of its portfolio in its ten largest positions, with 35.9% in the top five and no cash. In eight periods, from one month to fifteen years, it has beaten the S&P 500 all eight times and the Russell 1000 Growth six times. What I find of interest is that in no period did it beat its index comparisons by three percent or more. This suggests to me that it produced this record with the managers using largely the same stocks as the indices, exercising not only stock selection capabilities but also portfolio manager skills, demonstrating both are needed to produce good results. (Their report is available to subscribers. We have a small position in our managed accounts.)

Working Conclusion

If the equity market in the US is envisioned as a long race for humans or horses, I would say leadership is changing as the newer leaders pass tiring racers. The current low volume in the market appears to be the lull before a storm. Maybe we are hearing the early notes from The William Tell Overture as the storm gathers.

Any thoughts you would like to share?    

        

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/07/sentiment-appears-to-be-changing-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/07/independence-day-3-investor-lenses.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/06/what-did-fridays-market-political.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.