Showing posts with label Government Spending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government Spending. Show all posts

Sunday, October 20, 2024

Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !!

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

One measure of future dangers is the length of time identified stress points are ignored. Often, the longer the period of being unaware of increased risk levels, the greater the damage. The reason for this is that more assets are committed, so more damage is sustained. Somewhat like a pain in the mouth or heart.

 

The following stress points are in plain sight and should be diagnosed, even though some may not lead to sustained account damage or damage to clients’ capital. However, the real damage of a meaningful decline is often the lack of confidence to take advantage of the recovery. The following concerns are not in any particular order.

  • Pet owners are trading down.
  • PPG is selling their original business.
  • As mentioned in the FT, “Corporate debts as credit funds allow borrowers to defer payments using higher cost payments in kind “PIK”.
  • McKinsey is cutting their workforce in China.
  • There is an assumption that the first Fed rate cut is the beginning of a rate cycle of lower rates.
  • After all the government spending (election-focused bribes), the civilian labor force is only up 0.48% year over year, while government payroll is up +2.26%.
  • Barron’s 10 high-grade bond yields declined -27 basis points compared to a gain of +8 points for medium-grade bonds. (Wider spread for added risk?)
  • Consumer confidence fell 5.37 % last month.
  • The percentage of losing stocks compared to all NYSE stocks was 1.7% vs 5.1% for NASDAQ stocks.
  • Jason Zweig in the WSJ quoting Ben Graham “Investing isn’t about mastering the market it is about mastering yourself.” I agree and I pay a lot of attention to what Jason and Ben say. (I was given the Ben Graham award as President of the New York Society of Securities Analysts (NYSSA)).
  • P&G noted that their customers in the US and China were switching to cheaper brands.
  • In the 3rd quarter, American Express* had revenue gains of +8% and earnings gains of +2%. (A classic example of the cost to produce a revenue dollar becoming more expensive. (*A small position is owned personally.)
  • Volkswagen is closing German factories for the first time since 1938.
  • In Europe, some are starting to watch for disinflation. (Disinflation is much rarer than inflation and is much worse, as people reduce or stop spending.) 

 

Most current global political leaders are ignorant of micro-economics and thus can’t grasp macro-economics. They are not wholly responsible for this condition because their teachers didn’t understand them either. We will all pay the price for this ignorance.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

Mike Lipper's Blog: Mis-Interpreting News - Weekly Blog # 857

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Not Traders Are Worried - Weekly Blog # 856



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, April 4, 2021

Respecting the Opposition & Market - Weekly Bog # 675

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Respecting the Opposition & Market


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




Competition Lessons

As a competitive fencer, I regularly fenced men who were better than me. For the most part they had longer arms and were probably better athletes, a real advantage in fencing. I was determined to score as many touches as possible to win matches. The first thing I had to learn was to respect my opponents’ skills and physical advantages. I thus developed what boxers call counterpunching moves. These mental attitudes followed me into the world of investing, where they are called contrarian.


Applications

I believe it would be extremely foolish as an American who served in the US Marine Corps to not identify China as a strong and growing opponent, one whose moves should be respected. Despite having fund investments in China for clients and myself, I am forced to acknowledge China currently having the most prudent central banker. Despite apparently coming out of COVID-19 first, it is retarding its growth by squeezing the non-bank financial providers, who are major providers of loans to the tertiary sectors of their slowing economy. The service sector and light manufacturers have recently grown faster than the rest of their economy but have little in the way of collateral available to be pledged. (Over the centuries there have been numerous Chinese commercial collapses.) As China’s economy has been a major importer of goods and services from the US and the rest of the world, a slowdown in China can create problems here and elsewhere. Unlike other countries attempting to fuel their recoveries, they are delaying going after credit growth outside the banking system. The authoritarian power structure is attempting to get ahead of a problem that has caused disruptions in the past.


A second application of the respect principle is to acknowledge the lessons of the stock market. The most consistent market lesson being the teaching of humility. Below are three historic examples of what may be its future progress:

  1. A new bull market riding an economic expansion fueled by government spending.
  2. A third term of Obama’s lack of progress.
  3. A second coming of FDR’s elongation of an economic recession into a depression. 

I don’t know which path or combination of paths we will take, but I am prepared to be uncomfortable. Contrarian investing is uncomfortable and human beings take comfort in conformity. Contrarian investors must exercise patience, but as Saint Augustine said, “Patience is the companion of wisdom”, hopefully we have enough.


Current Confused Pictures

Hopefully, Positives

  • A new generation of investors providing quick liquidity to the less liquid.
  • Exchange Traded Products readily available to make directional bets.
  • Equity Mutual Fund Holders redeem on average at 4.2 years.
  • VIX readings dropping to 17.32 from 46.8 last March.


Perhaps, Negatives

  • JOC-ECRI change in a year +88.47%
  • Current performance of S&P 500 too high historically. Since 1926 it has averaged +10.3%. Do yearly returns need to decline below normal?

        % Change        Years

        72              1     

        20              2

        15              5

        12             10  

  • Over the last year, 12 major currencies rose vs the US$ and 2 declined. Below are the top 2 currencies increasing vs the US$ and the two that declined.

     Australia   +24.4%      Korea       -2.3%

     Singapore   +23.0%      Hong Kong   -0.3% 


Interesting 12-month numbers for Standard Poor’s 500

             13.34%  Average S&P 500 Fund

             13.61%  Average of 30 largest S&P Funds

             13.91%  Gross performance of the stocks


The average large-cap core fund gained +12.53% and probably had 1-2% in cash, suggesting the superiority of passive investing comes from being fully invested, low turnover, and low fees. This could be a good model for all investors in funds or their own accounts.


Two Post-Mortems

While there were some typos in last week’s blog, it had two observations that proved to be germane. The first being Archegos, the family office that had their equity total return swaps liquidated to meet margin calls. We mentioned both Nomura and Credit Suisse had announced expected losses from margin transactions over the weekend. What I didn’t know, was that on Friday, if not before, Goldman Sachs (*) was aggressively liquidating the collateral supporting the Archegos account, where the market action in a number of  “thin” stocks was bothersome. Early trades in Asia were also quite heavy. Sometimes instincts moves faster than knowledge. 

(*) Goldman Sachs is a position in our private financial services fund.


Focusing on instinct, my smart wife Ruth commented to me that not only was the price of food going up at the Supermarket, but also the price of paper goods. This was borne out Monday when it was announced that the price of cardboard boxes went up. These two instances prove that investing is not only an art form but also an active-duty sport.


What do you think?  



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-biggest-risk-we-all-face-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/03/2-presidential-lessons-to-be.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/03/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Saturday, August 11, 2018

Get Ready for: Declines, Recoveries, and Growth – Blog # 537



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Get Ready for: Declines, Recoveries, and Growth – Blog # 537


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page  2018 -



One of the prior major stock market declines was signaled when the O’Hare airport authorities would not let United Airlines sell its gate positions to reduce its debt. We may be approaching a similar signal. Media reports that after 31 years of owning the management company for Oppenheimer Funds, Mass Mutual Insurance is considering putting it up for sale at around 2% of assets under management. While this may be a fair price, many professionals would treat this result as negative because it is below full bull market valuation. At the same time the much respected T. Rowe Price (*) is reducing its commitment to large-cap in favor of small caps and international on the basis of valuations. Both of these elements are good reasons to prepare for future declines, recoveries, and growth as discussed in this blog.

As a long term investor in search of other long term investors we are confident that we collectively will experience declines, recoveries and growth. So much for recorded history, but the value of history is primarily the recognition that these types of events happen. Far too many look for history to be repeated exactly, without adjusting for the dynamic changes of the past. My task is not only to understand history, but to also understand the changes that will modify future paths.

We know that declines, recoveries and growth will happen because greed and fear exaggerate the natural cyclicality of nature. Successful predictors can use this for future events or dates, but should never predict both. That is why I can envisage the three events mentioned, but I clearly don’t know when they will occur or their magnitude. However, what I can do is prepare my thinking for each of these inevitabilities.

Declines
There is no question that there will be future declines in both the stock market and the global economy, which are often related, but not always.

As with most wars there are underlying causes of critical imbalances which can be readily observed, but there are also unpredictable flash points e.g. the assassination of the Arch Duke. Populations and their governments can manage through declines reasonably safely, or they can overreact and try to correct both the imbalances and the bad actors. Based on the historical record in this country, overreactions can lengthen and deepen declines. Many of those who lost lots of money in the stock market crash” of 1929-1932 and 1937 discounted their prior gains on paper then swore they would never return to investing in stocks. They and their families missed out on participating in the benefits of the long bull markets of the 1960s and post 1980s.

Strategies and Tactics
Essentially there are two  strategic approaches: abandon or ride through. Neither works particularly well if they are followed minimally. The abandon strategy promotes a misplaced sense of safety  because it does not recognize inflation.  As long as governments spend more than they take in we will have inflation eroding currency values.

The ride through the crisis approach assumes more than a full recovery, including perhaps some inherent gains for the loss of income during the period.  Clearly, even under the best of circumstances not all commercial entities will survive, but most will. However, it may take time. One of the high flyers in the excitement of the radio era (read mobile phones or the Cloud) was the old Radio Corporation of America (RCA). The stock price of RCA did not reach its pre-depression price until the 1960s, on the back of the promise of color television. Also, many farmers lost their lands to foreclosure due to leveraged borrowing.

Few investors fully subscribe to the two strategies of abandon or stay put,  utilizing tactics that address some of the concerns and opportunities of each. Some build up cash reserves, but there are two drawbacks to that approach. Firstly, a study of mutual fund portfolios and performance suggests that unless cash reserves exceed 25% of the portfolio near the top, it will only satisfactorily cushion a typical cyclical decline of 25% or less, not a secular decline of 50% or more. The second drawback, which a study of portfolio manager behavior reveals, is that there is too much comfort in cash and these portfolio managers miss out on buying cheap bargains.

There is another approach that probably works better for long-term investors, that is to gradually move equity portfolios into more defensive stocks. These stocks are generally absent in most market commentary and are often found by examining the rosters of relatively underperforming sectors and stocks lagging near the peak of the market. To me, two of the better hunting grounds for these searches are international and dividend paying “value” stocks.

International
There are two long term reasons to invest internationally. First, it is a hedge against the larger domestically traded stocks/funds in your portfolio. If one looks at our rank in terms of standard of living in the US compared to other countries, we have been slipping for sometime. The main reason for the relative strength in the dollar is that we are living in a period where almost every other country has threatening dissident groups, whereas our currency is perceived as safer than others.

Using mutual fund performance averages based on their investment objectives, of the 18 global and international fund objectives versus their US focused peers, only in real estate is the foreign fund better. I suspect that at least half the performance superiority in the first seven months of 2018 is the direct impact of the strength of the US dollar, which is unlikely to continue forever.

In many ways the more hopeful and sounder reason is that selectively there are many more opportunities outside the US than in it. There are world leading companies beyond our borders in technology and natural resources. Occasionally these stocks are priced more attractively and their younger populations create an attractive market opportunity. Educational standards and wealth are rising both in Asia and Africa, which should be fertile for investments long term. Thus for defensive (hedging) and aggressive (demographic) reasons, investing internationally makes sense, particularly if one uses select funds for administrative and liquidity reasons.

Value
In utilizing value for diversification purposes I am excluding “deep value”, which requires corporate actions, mostly mergers or acquisitions (M&A) to work out. Most M&A occurs during expansionist periods, not declines, so it may not provide much downside protection. For diversification purposes, the ideal value stock must have a history of paying dividends with an average payout ratio of about 50%- 75%, with a history of raising the dividend rate at least as much as recognized inflation. “Trust quality” or above BBB credit rating would also be good. Some strong institutional ownership would be a plus, as would a reasonably liquid stock. Some and all of these characteristics are found in average in some mutual fund portfolios.

Recovery Candidates
Product or service providers that are likely to be considered essential in the future include those that have sufficient management depth beyond the CEO to be the next generation of sound leadership. Also attractive are those companies that have surplus borrowing power to take advantage of product and corporate opportunities which may occur in troubled times.

Growth Candidates
Growing target markets rather than growth in market share is an important growth criteria. A multi-generational attitude also helps in the selection for legacy investment accounts. Sufficient internal research & development open to external sources would be best.

Fund/Manager Selection Tips
If the bulk of one’s assets and dreams are tied up in one asset, diversification should lean toward a couple of portfolios with a reasonably large number of securities, with the portfolios different in investment style. For the asset owner that is more liquid,  a portfolio of concentrated funds that complement each other rather than compete for attention is preferable.

We would be glad to help with the selection and management of funds to fulfill your needs.

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly atAML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.