Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Holy Week

The driving celebration of the week ended Sunday was the three dominant religions being able to conduct their Services peacefully. The US stock market contributed four days of generally rising prices, although there were clues related to critical concerns.

 

First, a slightly smaller percentage of NASDAQ stocks rose in price (59%), vs. 69% on the "big board". NASDAQ prices are generally more volatile and have a more professional audience than those on the followers of only New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). NASDAQ stocks have outperformed NYSE stocks for some time and one could conclude that their participants are more clued in than NYSE followers.

 

In considering our domestic markets, we should not forget our present and future are influenced by global actions. For example, last week the older western European stocks on average did better than our domestic stocks, even though they will be impacted by various tariffs and recessions. The twin concerns, tariffs and recessions, were the main worries during the four-day market week. As a contrarian thinker I believe both concerns are not properly focused.

 

I believe President Trump is using the threats of tariffs primarily as a force to begin a much larger, more powerful, and more difficult conversations. These conversations can be lumped under the label of non-tariff trade barriers. No single law or regulation will cover all these topics. They can only be addressed by the heads of the various countries, which Trump hopes will be brought to the negotiating table or private discussion by the threats of large tariffs.

 

Trump believes there are two main areas where the US is being disadvantaged, local trade restrictions and manipulated foreign exchange rates. Additionally, he believes only the most senior people can reach an effective compromise and he is willing to adjust US tariffs and other factors to reach his objectives. If I am close to being correct there is no telling what the ultimate results will be, as all negotiations will need to be reviewed in light of competition with other countries. Thus, we need to pay attention to the various twists and turns that will take place, to the extent they are revealed, and not to jump to any conclusions.

 

The second conundrum facing us as both citizens and investors is recognizing that periodic economic declines are inevitable. The world has not repealed personality traits, the impact of technology, nor climate conditions, which will all impact our financial condition.  

 

Goldman Sachs Studies

Goldman believes the odds of a US recession are getting higher. They studied the history of recessions and were able to divide the past into cyclical and structural recessions. On average, cyclical recessions end within a year and structural recessions average twenty-seven months.

 

My Most Fearsome Concern

We have all learned that history does not repeat itself, but rhymes. Thus, as an analyst my first exercise is to look at the worst decline the US has ever experienced, the Depression. As there is almost never a single individual who causes a major economic change, it is a mistake to label the cause of the Depression under a single name.

 

The 1920s was a period of rapid expansion of debt and even looser morals. By the end of the decade, both farmers and smaller banks were heavily in debt. To bail them out congress came up with the Smoot­-Hawley tariffs. (Similar to today, politicians were counting votes, while the financial side of government was concerned about the debts of dealers who had farmers as clients, as well as local small banks. The latter was such a concern that when FDR campaigned, he promised to keep the banks open then immediately close them after coming into power. To some degree, this experience may be like today's tariffs.)

 

When FDR came in with his "brain trust" of Harvard professors, they sought to change much of how the country was to be governed. (Somewhat similar to how edicts from the Supreme Court and other judges have been used to force change.)  

 

Much of what President Trump and Elon Musk are trying to accomplish is structural. Even if they can find effective people to carry it out, it will take a while to deliver the new ways of doing things to the marketplace. On the basis of the above thinking I fear the next recession will be structural, lasting a few years. I hope I am wrong.

 

Question: What do you think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

Mike Lipper's Blog: Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

Mike Lipper's Blog: Increase in Bearish News is Long-Term Bullish - Weekly Blog # 882

 

Did someone forward this blog to you?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Haven’t Found Bottom Yet! Investments & Military Win by Committing Reserves Successfully - Weekly Blog # 732

 

                                

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Haven’t Found Bottom Yet!

Investments & Military Win by

Committing Reserves Successfully

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Investment Success Defined 

Avoiding losses and participating in “bull markets” is the objective of my blog. To accomplish this goal, one needs to expect some losses. However, the key is to not lose too much capital, so gains are multiplied. The strategy I use builds up reserves when the prices of what my clients and I own are high compared to perceived general market risks. I allow capital reserves to build up to the point of meeting conservative cash expenditure expectations, plus a trading reserve for future investment. Years ago, insurance companies set up “valuation reserves” to capture gains above 20% to use for the next upswing. Inherent in this strategy is the assumption that there will be periodic down markets. The trick to making this a successful strategy is the proper timing and approach to committing reserves. 

 

Committing Reserves 

This is the single most difficult task, both for an investor and military leader. In each case the reserve can be wasted by committing too early, and that is why it is often committed piecemeal. For an investor it is important to identify a time and price soon before a price rise, whereas for the military it is near the point of exhaustion of the enemy’s supply chain. It is for this reason a market’s reaction to current events becomes much more important.

 

Why No Bottom Last Week 

 In theory, I should be calling a bottom for last week. We had a relief rally on Wednesday after the Fed publicly acknowledged inflation was more than transitory and committed to successfully addressing it. The next day, led by “growth stocks”, the market wiped out considerably more than the prior day’s gains, with further losses the final day of the week. 

Historically, the price level for the stock market occurs either before or after the high-volume day, when sellers feel compelled to liquidate at any price. We did not see this happen last week. I noticed at least three inputs that questions the longer-term outlook for stocks. 

 

“3 Strikes and You’re Out” 

This is what the baseball umpire yells when a batter misses the pitched ball three times. Perhaps that was the proper call for the week, with the three strikes against the Fed being their attempt to hit the inflation ball out of the park. However, they failed to see the very fast pitch delivered by the seasonally adjusted money supply. M2 grew 12.11% year-over-year, even after considering the current rate increase and three additional anticipated 50 basis point increases to 2.5%. This may be all the politically diseased Fed can do as it ignores the major cause of inflation, the stimulus (bribes) fed to the economy by the White House over the last two administrations. (I don’t know how much of the Russia-Ukraine war expenditures are in the current M2 numbers). 

Immediately following the rate rise, the major banks raised their prime rate to 4%. Remember, in theory the prime rate is reserved for the bank’s best credits and does not include much of a loss reserve. Currently, most banks are overflowing with deposits and a lack of good loans. Most commercial bank stock prices are also languishing based on their near-term outlook. If major banks require 4% on almost riskless loans, what should the investing and depositing public require from other financial institutions in the way of yield? This is the second strike against the market and the Fed. 

 The third and final strike is a curve ball ordered by the FTC and SEC. The regulatory mandates they extended way beyond prior policy practices.  If this expansion is permitted, public companies will expand less and many private companies will never be traded on US stock markets. 

To demonstrate how much the reach of these agencies has expanded. The newly appointed chair of the FTC recently announced she was examining the proposed takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk and a group of associates and lenders. The SEC simultaneously intends to examine the disclosures of ESG and compensation. (This could lead to transforming the current cyclical decline, from a bear market in progress to a secular recession/depression, following their FDR model.)  

 

A Bully Hits Someone Who is Down 

 Each week I view stock markets through the lens of mutual fund performance. Most of the time it is wise to pick an investment period that includes an up and down price market for analysis. This week I examined the latest fifty-two weeks, which includes both rising and falling markets. I found that there were only twenty categories that had positive returns out of 110 peer groups. The highest return was for the average commodity energy fund, which gained 97.33%. The smallest gain was 0.12% for dedicated short funds. The vast majority of the winners were asset heavy with a perceived marketable value. There were no intellectual property winners. Inflation is driving stock prices and the government is contributing to it, rather than addressing inflation, the biggest single tax on the financially disadvantaged. 

 

Question: Is your portfolio’s current value keeping up with inflation adjusted spending? 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/three-worries-april-near-term-slowdown.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/short-long-term-thoughts-weekly-blog-729.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/is-this-great-investment-era-ending.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.