Showing posts with label Large-Cap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Large-Cap. Show all posts

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Analyst Calendar: Preparation for 2026 - Weekly Blog # 895

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Analyst Calendar: Preparation for 2026

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

                             

 

 

Analysts should attempt to get ahead of the stock market. Starting next Tuesday, we are entering the second half of 2025. Using the performance of Large-Cap US Diversified Mutual Funds as a broad indicator of the experience of US investors, the first quarter of 2025 was relatively strong, but April’s second half was weak. Perhaps it was due to concerns about taxes, tariffs, and international turmoil. The Market slumped into June, then recovered through the final four weeks of the quarter, bringing average performance back to mid-single digit gains, with half in the last week, despite a 9% decline in the value of the dollar. Not a great foundation for the continuation of two 20% gaining years.

 

Starting next week, analysts will quietly begin gathering their thoughts on preparing forecasts for the next calendar year. For the most part they will not have the benefit of the proclaimed or quietly guided company estimates. The estimate for 2026 will be more difficult than prior years. Not only will there be comparisons of two 20% plus years, but it is also unclear what taxes, tariffs, and the value of the US dollar are likely to be. There are two other quandaries that should be addressed. We have entered a period where there is a shortage of necessary talent at companies. For tech companies there is a struggle to find AI personnel at prices approaching Wall Street levels. Industrial and service companies have approximately 400,000 open positions, despite many announcing plans to lay-off workers. To some degree, this speaks to the quality of present workers and their attitudes.

 

Another concern is the level of IPOs threatening private equity portfolios with unattractive opportunities to sell some of their holdings. These sales are necessary to raise sufficient cash to pay the dividends expected by present holders and retail buyers. Private markets could contract quickly, constricting private securities firms. An investment trend is normally near the end of its popularity when it becomes dependent on retail buyers.

 

The answers to these questions may not be determined in the third quarter. Even though the fourth quarter is the second highest selling period of the year, it may not provide quick answers for marketing forces expected to produce results.

 

It is possible the market may be saved through efforts in the unofficial “fifth quarter”, which can deliver either surprisingly good numbers or poor ones, setting up a splurge in the first quarter of 2026. These will rely on the increasingly popular “adjusted” sales and earnings per share numbers created through skilled accounting approaches. These are often approved by the firms’ accountants and are not objected to by the regulators.

 

The problem with this exercise is that it makes the following year more difficult for analysts and investors to understand the base for the real earnings power of the company next year.

 

Buyers be thoughtful.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inconclusive Week Hiding a Big Problem - Weekly Blog # 894

Mike Lipper's Blog: We may think we manage time, but time manages us - Weekly Blog # 893

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selective Readings of Data - Weekly Blog # 892



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 


Sunday, October 15, 2023

Change Expected - Weekly Blog # 806

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Change Expected

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Unusual Items

  • !200 CEOs give up their positions.
  • Disappointing sales for LVMH among most of their 75 labels. High-end retail sales below expected results in almost all geographies, the most damaging being China and the US.
  • Average ACT scores in the US are the lowest in 30 years, with Math scores of 19.5 out of a possible 36.
  • Expect liquidity pool to shrink as consumers use up government cash. Will likely lead to market volatility.
  • NASDAQ declines for the week, with 61% of prices down versus 50% for the NYSE. The NASDAQ has been the performance leader for some time.
  • China is producing 49% of global shipbuilding and has 68% of ship orders. Some are high value and some high tech.

 

Most Logical Changes Expected

For some time, the mutual fund performance rank order has not varied much. Using the latest week through Wednesday and 5-year performance. Ranked by 5-year performance:

                    ---Performance---

                    Latest

                     Week      5-Year

Large-Cap Growth    +2.75%    +11.67%

Multi-Cap Growth    +2.40%     +9.19%

Medium-Cap Growth   +1.52%     +7.30%

Small-Cap Growth    +0.15%     +5.11%

 

International       +2.28%     +3.57%

Global              +2.00%     +2.62%                                                                                                                                                                                            

Point of View

Believing that we live in an irregular, cyclical world, I expect the domestic rank order to be reversed in some future market period. One reason is the current effort of the FTC to reduce M&A activity of large companies acquiring smaller companies in horizontal deals, which I expect to fail. I anticipate an increase in M&A activity in the financial services sector, which includes banks, fund management companies, investment advisers, and fintech operations. Highly effective salespeople will be greatly valued, as will critical tech people. There will be cross-border and cross-industry mergers.

                  

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stock Markets Move on Expectations - Weekly Blog # 805

Mike Lipper's Blog: Prepare to be Bullish, Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 804

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selling: Art & Risks, Current & Later - Weekly Blog # 803

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Equity Markets Speak Differently - Weekly Blog # 777

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Equity Markets Speak Differently

What are the Bulls & Bears Saying?

 


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Prospects

All markets are in conflict between the different outlooks of buyers and sellers. They both tend to agree that stock markets will be a lot higher in the future, disagreeing only as to when, by how much, and the cause of a large advance.

 

One way to look at the conflict is to relabel the combatants as believers and historians. The believers have confidence in the factors they believe in, that have sufficient power to soon generate a substantial rise. In the current contest they lean toward a continuation of Democratic leadership.

 

The other camp agrees in the reasons to believe. They however base their view on a reading of economic and market history. Believing that the long list of current problems will be sufficiently attended to and will become better at some point.

 

The Numbers Trap

Humans have long figured out that there are seasons that change with some regularity and in a somewhat predictable rotational order. The ancients tried to time the change in seasons by inventing reasons for the changes, although most of the proclaimed reasons for the changes did not hold up. People eventually gave up trying to identify the causes and instead focused on the timing of the rotation.

 

Attempting to time the rotation relied largely on the periodicity of the changes. They tried to attach predictability to such events, like which members of long forgotten football leagues won the Super Bowl, or the term of US President. As someone who has studied both rotations, I have found that most of the time the results did have better than normal predictive value, but not perfect.

 

I spent many years consulting with the National Football League and the NFL Players Association on the selection of managers for their defined contribution retirement program. I paid attention to who won the Super Bowl each year, hoping the winner’s superior management skills would indicate which team had the best investment skills. I found that there was no consistent connection. Looking at this year’s results it seems the losing team had better results play by play, but the winner had a handful of winning or perhaps lucky plays in the last part of the game. Nevertheless, when asked which was a better team on game day, I felt the losing team was better.

 

Some market analysts have confidence in the “Presidential Cycle”, which is based on the four-year term of the US President. It assumes reelection to a second term is likely to continue the programs of the existing president. I believe this is not necessarily the case. Often in a second term the President is a lame duck, with less willingness or ability to help the party’s congressional election candidates. Some say the second term is an attempt to burnish the reputation of the office holder, a stark contrast to the motivation of the first term. With the recent split in party control of the House, executive orders have replaced difficult party line legislative actions. In this case there is a role for the judiciary, the third part of government, to impact the result. I think that is true this year.

 

If during any five-year period there is a meaningful change in corporate leadership, it can impact not only what legislation passes, but which legislation is carried out. Any change of leadership can impact what happens in the second and third years of a Presidential term. 

 

I suggest investors focus on the market, economy, and shifting political conditions to assist in guessing future stock market direction, not unrelated inputs.

 

Liquidity Drives Size Selection

Each week I examine the performance of equity funds, in part by the average size of the companies in their portfolios. In a week like last week, large-cap funds declined less than mid-caps and small-caps. Historically, the order of price movement is the complete opposite of their ability to generate earnings per share in the companies they own. 

 

I suspect there are two reasons for this. First, larger market-cap stocks have more liquidity than smaller-cap stocks, in part due to the NYSE change in attitude. In the market crash of 1987 market indices declined 25% in one day. At least one specialist firm continued to make orderly markets. That is, they kept the bid and asked spreads in their normal range by committing their own capital and debt on the buy side to offer liquidity to the market. By the end of the day “they went to the wall”. In other words, they were effectively bankrupt and had to close. (The next day there was a rally that returned profitability to the specialist book.)

 

Neither the exchange, nor the community, bailed them out. From that point on the center of trading liquidity deserted the floor. The remaining liquidity was to be found at the trading desks upstairs, which did not have the obligation to maintain orderly and tight markets. As investors we have all suffered from this withdrawal of floor liquidity.

 

The second force that hurt smaller company markets was more difficult to track and is even larger and more difficult to track today. The normal, faster moving earnings progress of smaller companies attracts M&A activity from larger companies and competitors, who hope to capture earnings and/or products/services growth absent in their companies. Note how few IPOs and acquisitions we have seen recently. (Part of this may be due to private equity funds delaying new investments until their valuations have recovered, based on higher comparative prices for their own expected sales.)

 

Working Conclusions

For those who are still believers, you need to learn how to take advantage of stressed markets. Those that are historically oriented need to be ready to pounce quickly in periodic bear market rallies.

 

Thoughts are appreciated.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Allow Our Investment Professionals to be Lazy - Weekly Blog # 776

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Can’t Find Totally Risk-less Conditions - Weekly Blog #775

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data Performance/Easy.Interpretation/Not - Weekly Blog # 774

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Sunday, July 19, 2020

“That Was the Week That Was” = Change - Weekly Blog # 638



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

“That Was the Week That Was” = Change

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Introduction
This week’s title is not for code breakers but refers to series television title that was the name of a comedy review from the early days of network television making fun of the strange things that happened during the week. In prior blogs I quoted Lenin regarding the slowness of most historical trends to develop, but that accelerate in just a few weeks. “Change” is a sudden disruption of past trends, which great investors anticipate. Good investors recognize changes early when underway, while average investors are trend followers and poor investors extrapolate trends far too long.

Week ended Thursday-July 16th 
The prior investment performance trends that had gone on for over a year were disrupted. (Based on experience, the most accurate performance data terminates on Thursdays, avoiding the rush to start weekends that begin on Friday afternoons for some. This is particularly true during the summer.) Past performance results were led globally by up to ten large tech-oriented companies, providing vital internet services to people who were “sheltering in place”. These companies were supported by up to forty important suppliers. The strong stock price performance of up to fifty companies gave the impression that our economies were in a “V” shaped recovery, if not the early stage of a bull market. If one looked at thousands of other companies, the lift off the pandemic bottom was more modest. The two tables below show a distinct change in performance leadership for US registered mutual funds in rising order of change for the week ended July 16th:

S&P 500 Index Funds    +2.02%

Large-Cap Value Funds  +4.89%  
Multi-Cap Value Funds  +5.42%  
Mid-Cap Value Funds    +6.58%  
Small-Cap Value Funds  +7.35%  

Large-Cap Growth Funds -0.70%
Multi-Cap Growth Funds -0.47%
Mid-Cap Growth Funds   +0.40%
Small-Cap Growth Funds +1.45%

This is the first week in memory that value funds not only beat growth funds, but meaningfully so. Also, I find it of interest that the size of the stock market capitalizations in fund portfolios impacted performance so markedly. The declining order of performance in the week may well be the cost of liquidity required by heavy traders.

The performance disruption of past trends also occurred in the performance of SEC registered, internationally invested mutual funds.

China Region Funds           -5.30%
Emerging Market Stock Funds  -2.20%
Latin American Funds         +0.30%
Japanese Funds               +1.44%
European Funds               +2.94%

Of the 25 best performing mutual funds this week, 16 were small caps and 13 were value focused funds. (Obviously, some good performers made both lists.) China Region Funds have been the leading geography to invest in for most of this year, while Europe has been going through a very long turnaround. As is typical of the future discounting attribute of stock prices, they are further along than economic reports. One should bear in mind that all numbers are based on translation into US dollars from local currencies. Thus, the presumed relative safety of US dollars could be impacting the above numbers. The S&P/Dow Jones Indices track 32 markets. In their latest report, 25 rose and seven declined, with one of the seven falling being US large growth.

Applying Change to Selections
While security holdings change very little in many fund portfolios, some constantly evolve. Those that make a limited number of changes believe that investors wish to own the kinds of securities they see in periodic reports. Others believe that their investors want the results of the following principles, which can lead to changes in both the weighting and names in their portfolio. Below is a list of tactical moves that one fund manager is applying as they react to the changes in perception of future developments.

Selling inputs (To generate cash for investment opportunities)
  1. Selling into rising strength
  2. Selling to normalize size of positions
  3. Selling into poor M&A activity

Buying Inputs (Building future sources to meet needs)
  1. Buying into declining prices
  2. Starting new positions in the best companies in a troubled sector
  3. Increasing market share of the stock that’s not already discounted
  4. Buying into strong balance sheets, spending discipline, and free cash flow generations, even when current earnings disappoint
  5. Expect rising oil and energy prices over next year or two, within a bear phase
  6. Capacity cutbacks create opportunities that create trading opportunities

Any thoughts?


 
Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/currently-selling-more-important-than.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/july-4th-lesson-need-to-hire-wise-not.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/06/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html



Did someone forward you this blog? 
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.