Monday, January 1, 2018

Keys to 2018: Sentiment, Surprises, and Confidence - Weekly Blog # 504



Introduction

William Shakespeare’s three witches in Act IV of Macbeth may have been one of the first to warn of bubbles when they chant “Double, double, toil and trouble; fire burn and cauldron bubble. (emphasis added). This prescription is a warning to me. I manage one account that is not being offered, starting in 1999 and is up 3.39 times original cost closing in on double, double.

Are we headed for trouble on the way to a bubble? Further, worth noting is that there are a number of SEC registered mutual funds that have doubled this year. Even some mutual fund averages have gained about four times a normal year’s gains with twelve separate fund peer groups rising  44.61% to 30.29% up to the penultimate day of the year. (The last that was available at this writing, the final day did not show much movement.)

The above mentioned trouble could be that driving these funds’ performances is about ten global tech equities. Typically at the top of many markets there are only a few leaders enjoying outsized gains.

In Shakespeare’s play it takes some time and plot development from the witches’ chant to fulfill their prophesy. Thus, it may take some future market developments for a similar fulfillment, or it may not happen. The way I track the route to an eventual peak is through watching sentiment, surprises and confidence indicators.

Sentiment

In its weekly poll of the sample of members, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) as published weekly in Barron’s, divides  its views into Bullish, Bearish, and Neutral. For the last two weeks this very volatile poll is showing over half of the respondents are bullish. Typically the split to the leader is more likely to be in the high 30% to low 40%.

There are many different ways to measure sentiments of investors in aggregate. To me the most useful lens is to look through the changes in valuation. Prices currently show what investors are willing to pay for various elements of fundamental data, dividends and interest; reported operating and GAAP earnings; reported and adjusted book value; among others. Currently with the stock market prices going up at a faster rate than announced and/or analyzed results, there is an increasing amount of optimism. Merrill Lynch has labeled 2018 as the Year of Euphoria. (I hope it is just a year of increasing optimism which normally leads to a normal price decline. Bouts of euphoria are rarer and lead to major market turning points that create subsequent, substantial declines to a lower level than when the rising stock market began.) Merrill and most of the investment world is cheering on the rise in various economic statistics with the belief that the best is yet to come. 

Better news and higher projections are increasingly being valued more highly. In most cases these are in the upper regions of their historical time series, but not yet setting new high watermarks in valuations. Traditionally auto analysts and some industry economists (after a particularly strong automotive sales year) worry that a great year brings forward demand from future years. When those succeeding years' occur they would be significantly below the normal sales trend line and produce a pro-cyclical rather than a continuation of the pro-growth periods.

Part of the problem of creating unsustainable peaks is that global political leaders are attempting to push job creation policies as measured by labor productivity. We may be entering a period of over-hiring because it is too difficult to find the right workers with appropriate skills and good job attitudes and discipline, thus we may soon be entering a job hoarding phase. Instead of focusing on the relatively small number of unemployed and under-employed, we should be looking essentially for higher consumption productivity. More people would benefit for higher quality products and services where increased demand leads to slower price increases and better service for consumers.

Near-term rise in sentiment is anticipatory of better future results, but probably can not be sustained as we fill the demands of consumers for goods and services at reasonable prices and quality. As sentiment normally follows an accelerating curve rather than a normal trend line, with the gains created it also creates a risk as to when it reverses a fall at a faster rate than in its acceleration phase. Enjoy, but be prepared.

Surprises

Shortly my good friend and former member with me on the board of the New York Society of Security Analysts, Byron Wien, will publish his annual list of at least ten surprises. For a condition to make the list its possible occurrence must be disbelieved by the majority of the professional investment community. Byron has a good batting average with over half of his “surprises” turning out to be accurate. 

I recognize that there will be surprises that most of us don’t anticipate. These can be positive or negative surprises. In terms of impact, with sentiment rising and therefore accepted, the upside is likely to be less than the downside surprises. 

Many of the financial media and other pundits focus much of their attention on the US. Clearly, there will be some US-centric surprises that will move the market. However we can not avoid being a consumer and investor in the globe.

I suspect that some of the most impactful surprises will come from Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. The interesting thing about the initial market movements upon the discovery of the surprise will be reversed subsequently. To me the key to these surprises is that we are not sufficiently paying attention to areas and subjects.  One somewhat overlooked opportunity caused by a surprise is often a chance to be on the other side of the reaction trade, buy when others are selling without price discipline or supplying to the market when there is excess enthusiasm. As sentiment rises, playing surprises could be a good tactic.

Based on many of the past large stock market declines, the biggest surprise is likely to be in credit creation. Some actual or rumored credit user or groups of users at an instant in time may be deemed unable to repay their debt and/or interest, and could cause a sharp drop in the stock market in more than one country. Credit like money is fungible. When credit  is withdrawn it creates a vacuum which is answered by rapid shifting of credit support to, at that time, the most credit-worthy borrowers. One way or another equity markets ride on a sea of credit to earn a rate of return in excess of interest rates charged.

 Confidence

One should not equate confidence with sentiment. Based on political history and my experience at the racetracks, in only a minority of the cases do they come to exactly the same conclusion at the same time, but they do every once in awhile. One of the better measures of confidence is to examine the age and experience of the most confident players and pundits compared with the least. Most people that are confident of the result have no idea how their confidence will actually work out. They don’t understand the tactics and mechanics of what will happen after the victory celebration.

Current View

The larger level of enthusiasm by people/investors who are not experienced, the closer we are probably to a significant change in direction, but as Saint Paul pleaded with God, “Not yet.”     

__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Monday, December 25, 2017

Better Portfolios from 14 Questions - Weekly Blog # 503



Better Portfolios from 14 Questions

The initial fourteen questions are:

1.  When will the money be needed?
2.  How would you rank these portfolio drivers:
      a) Economy
      b) Stock Market
      c) Bond Market
      d) Political Swings
      e) Popularity
   
3.  What are the triggers of change anticipated?
4.  How do you define a cash conversion timetable?
5.  How would you structure the replenishment of the Short Duration portfolio?
6.  What are the tolerable levels of Absolute and Relative Risk by TIMESPAN Portfolio?
7.  What is the sustainable spending relative to inflation?
8.  What should be the appropriate performance measures for each TIMESPAN Portfolio?
9.  What allocation or weightings should each TIMESPAN Portfolio receive?
10. What is the client's tolerance for known absolute and relative losses?

In addition, the following need to be determined:
 
11. Governance Procedures
12. Turnover of portfolio 
13. Legacy Requirements
14. Termination Procedures

I would be happy to discuss privately with any of our subscribers if they are having difficulty answering these questions and how the answers might impact their better portfolio construction.

Introduction

Portfolio construction and management is an art form and at worst an alibi for failed results. The way we practice the art form is to recognize that it is an expression of deeply held personal beliefs as well as reactions to client needs vs. desires and current conditions. Structuring each portfolio is a continuing discussion and can encompass aggressive and conservative tendencies which can be executed through individual securities and/or open end mutual funds as well as diversified holding companies.

Diversification & Weighting

Diversification is a method of risk control.  Component weighting provide brakes and accelerators for portfolios. The more difficult tasks are after the initial portfolio construction is in place as market prices shift the relative contribution of each component.

A key determination is what should trigger purposeful changes to the weighting in the portfolio?

One should review the portfolio weightings of the components. This review can be done at regular calendar intervals or as a reaction to expected or actual market conditions. The portfolio weightings will eventually become distorted by performance. Due to the good performance of some of the components they will rise in importance in the portfolio and by that fact alone reduce the importance of other components. Both should be examined closely. 

If only one-third of the big gains can be attributed to operating earnings gains, not published eps gains, the rise in the market prices will be due to perceived valuation changes. If the valuation measures are close to or exceed past record levels, there is increased risk which should be addressed. Any cutback or elimination does not prevent risks returning in full or partially. The more difficult task is when the defensive positions lose enough relative weight due to the bigger gains of the winners or some temporary price declines. If the weights of the defensive positions drop by more than 50%, they may not have sufficient weight to substantially reduce the fall of the entire portfolio when there are periodic market declines. In these cases moving some money out of the winners to the more defensive positions should be considered.

In addition to the 14 listed above, additional questions need to be answered before the investment structures to be used in each portfolio are determined.

Questions for the Short Duration Portfolio

This portfolio’s payments could include all payments, truly an operating expenditure bank. Or it could be used exclusively for short-term emergencies, as a reserve for the unexpected; e.g., repairs, health emergencies, and other unanticipated costs.

One of the most critical question for the Short Duration Portfolio is: how much of this account should be available to convert to cash within one to three days and how much within thirty days?

Questions for the Replenishment/Feeder Portfolio

What is the likely exhaustion date of the account before replenishment? This can be triggered by the minimum value of the account before replenishment and will impact construction of this portfolio.  Also you will need to decide whether replenishment capital will be partial or complete in one transfer. In addition, you will need to establish the level of inflation risk that can be accepted before adjusting replenishment moves.

Questions for the Endowment or Lifetime Account

1. What are the expected governance procedures as the key investment decision maker ages or is no longer competent or alive? 

2. How should the replenishment and short duration portfolios be refunded and will they change their nature over time? 

3. What will be the risk tolerances of absolute/relative losses, inflation losses, and appropriate benchmark measures? The tolerance for risk assumptions moving through various market cycles will frame part of the equation for the long-term success of this account. 

4. What is the expected longevity of this account? 

5. How should the turnover procedures for the final legacy account be determined?

Questions for the Legacy Account

What will control the duration of this account, the exhaustion of the money or people involved in fulfilling a mission? Is it to be thought of as a perpetual account?

Will the Legacy account also need to setup and manage a separate short-term account with its own replenishment device?

Our Investment Approach

Each of these accounts can be managed aggressively or conservatively. Individual securities, both publicly traded and private assets along with open-end mutual funds can be used. 

Each account should reflect the wishes, beliefs, and focus of the capital owner.

Seasons Greetings

Ruth and I wish you a Merry Christmas, a Happy Boxing Day and a Healthy, Wealthy New Year.

A Note to our Email Subscribers

Last week a small number of email subscribers received a fake email from me offering supposed documents to be downloaded from “The Cloud.”  We are taking the following steps to reduce this type of cyber-risk:

1. We are tracking those email addresses targeted by this fake email and other similar phishing.  Please let me know if you receive this type of fake email, BUT PLEASE DO NOT OPEN IT. 

2. Next month we are changing the email delivery system for subscribers who receive the blog with the subject line: “Mike Lipper’s Blog.”  We seek to reduce cyber-risk and to make the blog more convenient to read. We will give you sufficient notice.  

3. Those who receive my blog post’s title as the subject line of their emails from me (“Single Portfolio Cannot Do Multiple Jobs, Weekly Blog # 502”) will not notice a change.
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Single Portfolio Cannot Do Multiple Jobs - Weekly Blog # 502



Introduction

Would you choose to go to a pharmacy that had only one medicine, a plumber who had only a wrench, or an auto repair shop that had only a screwdriver? My guess is no, you would want a reasonably complete set of tools with some being alternatives to a given general solution. Yet most individual investors and many institutional investors gather their securities investments in a single portfolio and report to themselves and others in terms of a single performance result for the most current period. This is similar to going to an inadequately supplied pharmacy, plumber, or auto repair shop! For this very need, I have developed a different way of arranging investments. My preferred structure is based on the timespans that investments specifically need to perform in terms of cash generation and asset price performance. This structure, TIMESPAN L Portfolios®, leads to the way I examine all of the various inputs to making investment decisions including the weighting of buy, sell, and holding choices. Thus, I am continually looking to solve simultaneous equations with multiple unknowns to drive specific solutions.

TIMESPAN L Portfolios

I am using four separate portfolio structures as filters to examine inputs. (I would be happy to discuss with subscribers the various inputs as they may apply to their portfolio structures which are mentioned.)

Current or Operating Portfolio

This is the portfolio that must need current operating payment needs. For far too many this is their only focus. Current price performance becomes paramount to all of their investment thinking. In these nanosecond responses to news/rumors, global marketplaces speed to change directions that may be more important than the depth of thought. For example this weekend there are two inputs that can shape actions. The first is that on Friday, December 15th, the NASDAQ Composite’s price broke out of a month-long constrained price pattern. For some this may be a bullish event. For most of this year the combination of mid and small technology companies plus the well known FAANG companies were driving the major stock market indicators. For the last month while the NASDAQ was flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 were rising. There was a worry that if the performance leader was not moving higher, the followers would eventually stall as well. Thus the Friday breakout could be viewed as important. This is particularly true because in the week that ended Thursday night the only US Diversified Mutual Fund averages to decline were those of the Mid and Small market-caps, excluding the Short Biased funds which also declined.

The second input was the volatile American Association of Individual Investors’ weekly survey showed a major jump of bullish investors to 45% of their sample compared with 37% and 36% the weeks before. The progress of the US tax bill was probably the cause for the surge. I personally find this as extremely premature. As of Sunday I have not seen the conference committee’s full draft. There is still room for some changes as both houses pass a bill. As a practical matter until we see the implementing regulations which are likely to be more complex than the bill itself, we won’t be able to carefully apply the bill to our own taxes. Relatively soon there is likely to be a Tax Corrections Act plus there is a good chance that tax and/or civil courts will modify the regulations.

Both of these inputs are speculative but give support to the bulls near-term.

Replenishment or Presidential Cycle Portfolio

This is an unusual portfolio device to replace the funds allocated to the operating portfolio that have been expended to meet the current needs of the account. Its timeframe pivots on probable changes. These changes may be in terms of political or corporate leadership. The second element would be significant if the bulk of the investments are concentrated in companies with critical roles to their success leaders.

At the moment this portfolio has the biggest hurdles to climb. In the normal course of market history it is reasonable to expect to see a stock market price decline and recovery in periods of four to seven years. Currently, it appears we are building toward a peak. The very inputs mentioned for the Current/Operational Portfolio shows signs of providing the missing enthusiasm which is present immediately prior to a peak. One of the ways to get stock buyers to join in on the rise is to suggest that the rise is not a cyclical phenomenon but part of a long-term growth trend. We are already seeing broker’s headlines declaring “Global Economy Stronger for Longer.” We are also seeing earnings estimates going out to 2020-2022.

As a young junior analyst struggling to come up with annual earnings estimates I became apprehensive when I started to see the justification for buying certain stocks on the basis of their purported five year projected price/earnings ratios after a “hockey stick” type of growth pattern. The result did not turn out well. We are now seeing estimates that global stock markets may reach levels of $100 Trillion and at least one company expected to reach the $1 Trillion level.

US investors are not blind to all of the risks in today’s marketplaces. Their aggregate response to these risks is to invest outside of this country. The largest single net flows this year are into International/Global Equity mutual funds and ETFs, with the latter being driven by institutional owners. Perhaps it is warranted as most markets are selling with price/book value prices below those in the US. (There may be less massaging the book values than the reported earnings.)

Endowment or Post-Decline Portfolio

I believe it is reasonable to assume that there will be both a stock market decline and a recovery which eventually will lead to much higher price levels. There are two keys to benefiting from this prediction. The first is the careful management of assets going into the peak and recovery cycle and the second is to benefit from the probable change in market leadership.

The endowment period is probably as long as the youngest decision maker is in that position, but likely more than ten years.

Typically new leadership comes from overlooked companies and sectors that have gone through major structural changes during the peak/decline cycle. This is often the type of period where prior momentum plays lose ground to contrarian plays. I have two examples of this thinking. The first could be Britain. Because of necessity, the UK comes out of BREXIT stronger than when it entered the divorce procedures. As is often the case the winners could be centered in the mid and small-cap domestic oriented companies.

The second good endowment prospects are what we use to call “warehouses.” These were not physical warehouses, but stocks that would not lose much value in a decline and had reasons to have a better than historical experience in the future. Today there are two, somewhat controversial, opportunities of interest. The first is the oldest warehouse for more than a century, AT&T. While in truth it is the recast Southwestern Bell along with a number of acquired former Baby Bells. I am not attempting to guess the final result of the proposed merger with Time Warner. My interest is focused on the likely leader in the Fifth Generation internet which could well be dominated by AT&T as the technological and capital leader. The declining value of their long lines infrastructure could be reversed.

The other warehouse that is even more controversial is General Electric, which was the first large company I analyzed. The slimmed down current company is essentially being rebuilt around its capability with engines. The power business, particularly in the conversion to the use of natural gas, should be a major plus. The aircraft engine business is very attractive in terms of the parts and services involved. What are labeled their healthcare products are in reality supplying the mechanical/electronics patient movement businesses.

I view both of these stocks as substitutes for ten year US Treasury Bonds, which currently yield 2.4% and AT&T yields over 5% and GE 2.7%.  The income from the bonds is fixed. I suspect that the two warehouses will raise their dividends at least equal to published inflation if not higher. Further over time their pension expenses will decline through pension risk transfer contracts with Prudential Financial or other insurance companies. Also I expect that the number of employees and their ages will decline easing their retirement expenses.

Legacy/ Future Generations’ Portfolio

The nice part of managing money for this portfolio is that I won’t be around to see whether it works or not. I hope it does work because it will be important for my grandchildren, great grandchildren and their beneficiaries. This is the most challenging portfolio. While some of the future winners will be leaders from today, some will be a surprise. It is in the latter group that I am focusing on in the beliefs that there will be some changes which will lead to good investments.

The first idea is that much of what we invest in today is anchored in the so-called permanent or physical world. In future generations I think we will be living in more fluid situations. Even today’s tax bill may be driving to praising liquidity over permanence. Individual ownership of real estate could give way to greater rentals. With the growing retirement capital gap we may need to increase savings and get higher returns on our capital as we live longer and more expensively. My guess is that we will see more century and longer bonds,  possibly perpetuals.

The second idea derived a bit from the first is that business and industry structure can and will likely change. We are already entering a phase of vertical as distinct from integrated mergers. The recently proposed merger of Aetna* into CVS/Caremark is being analyzed as a process to lower the cost of drugs. I see some other, more important long-term advantages. First, as a data-hawk the idea of putting the aggregate data in terms of medicines with health and life insurance statistics could have enormous advantages to the companies and could well provide better healthcare for patients. There is perhaps an even bigger potential advantage to the proposed merger. CVS is used to their customers coming to them. Aetna has to go out to get their insured through direct or agent sales efforts. With the increase in marketing and sales supported technology the dollar levels of future sales could expand materially.

* Shares personally owned 
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.