Sunday, September 3, 2017

Is the “Two Step” the Last Dance of the Bull Market? - Weekly Blog # 487



Introduction

Many years ago when people actually held each other there a very energetic fast dance called the “two step” which exhausted the dancers and often at the end left them clinging to each other. I am wondering whether there is a reasonable chance that we are setting up a “two step” dance before we have the “big one,” a once in a generation major decline.

A Contrarian View of Current Sentiment

A basic belief derived from history is that the only attribute that market survivors share is a well earned sense of humility. A study of history through the ages, cultures, and fields of endeavor shows that at critical points most people are wrong, but not always. Viewing the current stock market through that lens raises the possibility that we can be on the edge of a meaningful market advance.

A number of good market analysts pay more attention to sentiments and shifts in sentiments than economic and financial ratios. There are a number of sentiment readings, some published in Barron’s each week. One that has caught my eye is the weekly readings from the American Association of Individual Investors which also parallels my sense of institutional investors thinking as indicated by changes in transaction volume. In the last three weeks the percentage of bullish individuals has dropped from 34.2% to 25.0% with only a minor increase in neutral views going from 33.0% to 35.1% with a major rise in the bearish column from 32.8% to 39.9%. One can understand that the current political and military events are matters of concern, but in theory investors should have longer term time horizons than day traders. Both my study of history in general and the learned analysis from the racetrack, suggests to me that the odds, not the certainty, is that the dramatic switch in sentiment is wrong.

Interesting to me is that market volume has not picked up. This indicates to me that while people are generally worried about conditions they are not now acting to preserve their wealth or that of their clients.

Stock Market Analysis

What is more interesting to me, particularly as an investor in some smaller cap funds, is that the NASDAQ index has gone to a new high. The older and broader indices both in the US and a number of other markets are in striking range of new highs. While the NASDAQ index did hit a new high on a light volume Friday, it did not go up to qualify as a clean breakout of a past trading range and could reverse and create a top. Recognizing I am intrigued with the possibility that the index will achieve a breakout velocity.

The tactical importance of a breakout, particularly if followed by others, is that the prior reversal patterns, called “head and shoulders” becomes a base for a material advance. The base will show a rather large volume of past sellers who may feel the need to get back into the market to participate in future gains. Often the past sellers left large relatively high quality stocks and now may feel the need to quickly catch up through more than normal (for them) speculative investing.

Thus a vigorous “two step” dance could be in our future.

Fears of “The Big One”

One way I attempt to keep up with investing globally is when possible to read English language foreign media both for their local and global views. Recently I read an article in The Star Online from Malaysia where Tan Sri Andrew Sheng who writes on global issues from an Asian perspective. While enjoying the 24.7% gain in the MSCI Emerging Market Index, he is concerned that we may be heading for a major drop. In this light he as we all should re-read Charles Kindleberger’s “Mania, Panics and Crashes” (Macmillan, 1996). He identifies the following steps to the collapse labeled the South Sea Company Bubble of 1720:

  •           Displacement
  •          Credit/ Monetary Expansion
  •           Over Trading
  •           Financial Distress
  •           Fraud, Swindles, and Malfeasance
  •           Revulsion, mistrust of shady products and intermediaries
  •           Panic selling

We have seen similar risks attached to a number of other panics before and after the South Sea Company Bubble panic. His bullish view is that he does not see enough similarities to today’s markets to fear  a repeat  panic.

The odds are that he is correct that the next decline will be one of the more normal falls. In the US context when we had floor specialists and other well capitalized broker/dealer trading desks this meant declines in and around 25%, not the once in a generation collapse of 50%.

However, as the job of a prudent analyst is to think the impossible thoughts. I look at the above itinerary to panic and feel we may be on a similar somewhat predictive path. One might suggest that either the internet or bitcoin qualifies as displacement. The key concern with displacement is that it is an excuse at least temporarily in believing old rules of prudence no longer apply. The growing lists of unicorn valuations for private companies that have little or no profits but with perceived great futures. It makes me nervous that some very good mutual funds are currently profitably benefiting from their private equity investments. Some less sound funds may follow and could have liquidity problems.

Our friendly central banks and deficit spending by governments and the growing number of new credit funds are certainly expanding money supply to the market systems. The mere hint of a “tapper” can cause both bond and stock markets to shudder.


At the moment most of the remaining sign points are not flashing great concern which is why I have not built reserves up in our long-term oriented mutual fund managed accounts. However, I am very concerned about the item of revulsion and mistrust of intermediaries. Some in the media are perfectly looking to shout “fire” in a crowded space. In addition, numerous politicians may act against all the intermediaries and their favored products. Their math is not based on dollars or other currencies, but on numbers of potential swing votes. As a critical element of self protection those of us who are professionals in the market need to have our clients and their beneficiaries understand that while we undoubtedly make mistakes, we are essentially honest and place them ahead of our own short-term financial interests.

It is a mistake to rest our relationships primarily on performance, particularly short-term performance.

With appropriate level of concern and caution I am still a believer that the process of prudent investing can generate longer lasting wealth than most activities, as long as it is based on our best efforts.

Momentary Input

On an intermittent rainy Sunday on the Labor Day weekend, the crowd at one of the glitzy shopping malls, The Mall at Short Hills, crowds approached the Christmas season levels. The big difference that I noted is that more men were in attendance, not just as bag carriers. They were actually shopping and often not in the company of female companions. At numerous stores there was a major effort to divert credit card sales to their home or co-sponsored brands. Retailers are also looking to capture long-term relations not just current sales. This is a necessary effort, hopefully it is not too late to keep any of the stores open for business in the malls.

Question: How quickly will your humility permit you to reverse some of your investment choices?                                

__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Accurate and Misleading Measures Will Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 486



Introduction

A cynic is described as knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. In a society supposedly led by the intelligent there is a great tendency for the top-down thinkers to be a source of guidelines that a cynic would produce. Experts pandering the supposed short attention span of the populace produce mathematically accurate measures for comparisons to aid or direct decision making. These “experts” are found in government, media, universities, and private practices.

Three examples of this approach and their results illustrate this cynical attitude are as follows:

  • Car buying by gas mileage delivered
  • College selection by test scores and future income
  • Investment choices vs. securities indices

Car Buying

The US government in its desire to foster climate management requires auto manufacturers to place on the price stickers the estimated average gas mileage of each car being considered with the intention to lead the buyer to purchase the most fuel efficient vehicle. Early after these requirements were promulgated some of the manufacturers advertised their high number of miles per gallon. While initially there were some market share shifts in that direction, but recently the relatively low gas mileage SUV and light truck models market shares have risen dramatically.

Why didn’t the guidance work? There are two main reasons. The first is that in buying a new car the buyer is interested in other values. Many buyers either consciously or not want their purchases to say something about them either to themselves or others. This is the basis of most successful advertising. The second reason is that the number set of just city and highway driving consumption is inadequate on two levels. First, in the early years of car ownership the cost of fuel is among the smallest amount spent on the car, where normal repairs and servicing (plus in certain locations garage and insurance) are higher than gas. Second, none  of us are average in many things that we do or consume. If the data showed the range of consumption, it may become very clear that our own driving habits have a great deal to do with the results.

College Selection

For many people the single or the next most important purchase is their school education. As with any purchase it is useful to examine the transaction from both sides of the trade. From the student and/or the student’s family viewpoint early on in the decision process there is a series of statistical arrays to sort through. These include test scores, acceptance ratios, and average income expectations. Again these pinpoint numbers do not show the ranges of outcomes or even in most cases the difference between averages and medians.

I have had the privilege of sitting on two Boards of Trustees of universities that I didn’t attend. I have watched in each case the admissions staff create a model of the desired incoming class. The importance of test scores is only in the absence of other indicators. For some universities class ranking is more important combined with an overall grade point average and trend. The incoming class should augment the other students in terms of academic, sports, and social skills to produce the best universe for the school over the next few years. From their point of view, the yield of the accepted applicants to those who attend is an important measure. The odds are that an application without a visit particularly from a distant home raises the probability of attendance question. I suspect, but have no confirmation, an eye should be placed on the odds of future financial or public success of the student. In these lights, awards and work progress either for pay or organized charities is important.

In my opinion, one of the tragedies of the American college scene is the level of student debt being assumed. Too many students and their families believe just graduating from college is the ticket to a successful career. They don’t try to determine the percent of the starting class that graduates on time, the range of income earned immediately after graduation and over the working lifetime, and an all-in estimate of the costs to attend a college including a reasonable estimate of spending. A non-statistical measure that can be probed through interviews is whether the prospective college student is ready for this level of commitment and responsibility. As with many things in life, the selection of schools should not be solely or perhaps even importantly, a “by the numbers” exercise.

Investment Choices

Making investment choices can be intellectually and emotionally difficult. No wonder many people including professional investors seek quick, simple decision tools. Often they are serviced by media or salespeople that have been trained under the mantra of “keep it simple, stupid.” While the summation of a planned course of action can, and often should be, transmitted simply, most simple thinking is simply wrong. Any one sided decision that does not consider both the rewards and the risks of each decision is unwise.

The most grievous mistake is to make a comparison of two unequal subjects.  Securities indices were developed as a sales method to describe the movement of a market as if it was a single force, not a collection of many. Pooled investment vehicles, including mutual funds, are more than a collection of individual securities. Mutual funds are a legal entity that are required to follow specific federal and state regulations. Funds have expenses involved with gathering and redeeming assets, expenses of managing assets, including transaction costs. In may cases, through some marketing activity the ability is provided to discuss immediate concerns of an investor that is troubled due to personal or market concerns. Historically, a wise steadying hand has prevented many investors from selling out at the bottom. None of these functions and constraints are on the publisher of indices. (I was one a number of years ago.)

Recently, I have noticed a number of brokerage houses and other wealth management organizations are attempting to hire qualified analysts in their fund selection efforts. I wish them well as that is part of the process of what we do. It is not easy once you no longer rely solely on “The Big Mo” or momentum as spoken by a former US President. One of the great dangers of following momentum is that it can’t go on forever in recognition that once everyone is dancing to the same tune, there will be no new followers. Momentum often ends abruptly with sharp reversals.

Fund selectors should be focusing first on comparisons with other mutual funds that are actually doing what the fund under scrutiny does, also other funds that could do those things but don’t. As someone who learned basic analysis at the racetrack, in every decision there are odds that one can be wrong. Each manager, active or passive could be wrong. The critical skill set is mixing funds with different potential risks into a portfolio that on average can sustain it itself under varying circumstances.

Conclusion

In each of the three decisions discussed the single most critical variable is the individual involved. How you drive will determine your gas mileage and satisfaction with your car. The student will for the most part determine his/her success at college and beyond. The owner of the securities or funds will be the biggest single determinator of the investment. In addition the people that manage the funds will drive their investment vehicle within the range of available choices and they are more important than their records.    
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Labels Poorly Reported and Understood Could Hurt Performance - Weekly Blog # 485



Introduction

Most brains require some semblance of order often to make judgments. The first thing we do when we are exposed to a set of conditions or facts is to compare it to others in our memory banks. Our memories are in effect filing systems based on some preordained classification system which are labeled internally. Because we prefer fast, if not instant, decisions, we use labels as the main filters to evaluate the new set of facts or conditions.

In most cases we pay little attention to the labeled comparator. We don’t know who and why the label was created. We don’t know the boundaries to the classification, we don’t know the sorting process used to create the universe within the classification, we don’t know the range within the label and the correlations and dispersions within the classifications that serve as labels. Perhaps most importantly we aren’t familiar with who makes the decisions in including or excluding components  and their profit motivations.

What I believe are faulty conclusions due to labeling and their comparisons are found in a number of topics which we read about as highlighted below:

Mutual Funds and Other Portfolios

Often portfolios are compared on the basis of their investment objectives no matter where their geographical focus is. Each week I look at the results published by my old firm. They break the universe of SEC registered mutual funds and their performance into close to 100 different investment objectives. In numerous cases they use the same generic investment objective names for largely domestically oriented funds, global funds and international funds. Global funds have to have some significant portion devoted to the US as well as other legal domiciles and  international funds don’t invest in the US.

Comparing Large-Cap Growth Funds average performance does appear to be similar in their results year-to-date through August 17th; Domestic +17.41%, Global +17.24% and International +18.10%. This makes sense as almost all Large-Cap companies around the world are multinationals  and are used by large financial institutions in both their home and foreign markets.  Most differences in performance can be attributed to the way the managers address the fluctuating value of the dollar as reported to dollar based investors.

Quite a different set of conclusions should be derived when reviewing Multi-Cap Core funds. These are typically equity oriented funds that can invest without constraints, often called “Go-Anywhere Funds.” The domestic version average was +7.76%, Global +12.44% and International +16.29%. When a change in geographical focus of companies’ legal domiciles leads to an international performance double the domestic average, the different opportunity set results suggest a faulty comparison under the banner of Multi-Cap Core.

Comparisons within industrial sectors can be even more skewed. While both are losing money this year through last Thursday, the domestic oriented Natural Resources funds on average were down -20.34% and the global natural resource funds only -5.90%. As global commodity prices are not that geographically sensitive and are usually priced in US Dollars, the difference appears to be in the opportunity set.

A similar but positive performance spread can be seen in the average Financial Services fund. The domestic oriented funds on average gained +3.30% whereas the Global Financial Services funds averaged +12.96%. The difference may be due to the level and direction of interest rates and possibly changing regulations. (More on this below.)

Is it any wonder that for some time when US mutual fund investors have completed their needs for domestic funding of their objectives that a portion of them have been investing beyond their borders? They got it right whereas those that lumped narrowly defined investment objectives based on where their legal domiciles are, got it wrong and are misleading themselves and some of their investors as to where the current action is.

Fixed Income Returns

I among others, but not the average mutual fund investor have had an overly cautious attitude toward fixed income funds. Using the same data source as used for equity funds, I failed to appreciate that there are seven different fixed income objectives with average gains in the 4% level, and five above 4%, with total return gains from +5.66% up to +11.70% for Emerging Market Local Currency Debt Funds. On an annualized basis alone currently these funds meet most pension funds’ payout requirements. Things are better than they seem.

Stock Comparisons

We have been barraged by stories as to the FANG (Facebook, Apple, Netflix, and Google/Alphabet as well as Amazon) stocks have been driving the S&P 500 performance with their gains. Few except Kopin Tan in Barron’s mention that a Chinese quartet labeled JBAT (JD.com, Bandung, Alibaba, and Tencent) are up more than double the leaders in the US. While there are great global companies in the US included in the FANG cluster, what is happening is a global phenomenon with some leaders outside the US growing faster. What this suggests is that if we want to invest in leaders we need to look beyond the constraints as to where a company’s corporate headquarters is, where it was incorporated, or even the stock exchange that is its main market.

Government Analysis

Part of the reason seasoned politicians around the world have been wrong on their expectations of what voters will do I suspect is the combination of inaccurate data, but more importantly wrong or meaningless classifications. Due to the short attention span of people within and beyond the political sphere, labels become short-cuts that can mislead. For example, as pointed out by the talented Randall Forsyth in Barron’s, the current US Administration is quite accomplished in getting to its goals. Each new or changed federal regulation needs to be recorded in the Federal Register. On an annualized basis the current Administration is responsible for 61,330 pages, whereas the former Administration in 2016 produced 97,000 pages. Not the 2 for 1 promised but a good start. The media has spent all its time on the legislative action, whereas both the current and former Administrations ruled primarily by executive actions. Thus the comparisons with legislative actions alone are misleading.

Question of the Week:

What other labels and classifications do you think are misleading to sound investment decisions?
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.